Showing posts with label vector cross product. Show all posts
Showing posts with label vector cross product. Show all posts

Saturday, August 24, 2019

Chapter 7.31 - Angular Momentum about a Fixed axis

In the previous sectionwe saw power derived from a torque. In this section, we will see .angular momentum in case of rotation about a fixed axis'

In chap 7.17, we saw the basics about angular momentum of a system of particles
We saw the following information:
Information 1:
Eq.7.19: $\mathbf\small{\frac{dl}{dt}=\vec{r}\times \vec{F}=\vec{\tau}}$
• That is: 'Rate of change of angular momentum' calculated over an instant is the torque experienced by the particle at that instant

Information 2:
• To get the total angular momentum $\mathbf\small{\vec{L}}$ of a system of particles, we add the angular momenta of individual particles
• Thus for a system of n particles, we have:
$\mathbf\small{\vec{L}=\vec{l}_1+\vec{l}_1+\vec{l}_1\;+\; .\; .\; .\;+\vec{l}_n=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{i=n}{\vec{l}_i}}$
• Note that, this is an addition of vectors. That is., we have to add the momenta vectorially
• In the above equation, we know that: $\mathbf\small{\vec{l}_i=\vec{r}_i \times \vec{p}_i}$
• So the equation in (1) becomes:
Eq.7.20: $\mathbf\small{\vec{L}=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{i=n}{(\vec{r}_i\times \vec{p}_i)}}$
• If required, the $\mathbf\small{\vec{p}_i}$ can be further split up as: $\mathbf\small{\vec{p}_i=m_i \times \vec{v}_i}$

Information 3:
Eq.7.21: $\mathbf\small{\frac{dL}{dt}=\vec{\tau}_{ext}}$
• Based on this equation, we can write:
The 'rate of change of angular momentum of a system of particles' at any instant is equal to the 'sum of external torques on all the particles'

We now want to see a special case:
The angular momentum about a fixed axis
We will write it in steps:
1. From information 2 above, we have:
$\mathbf\small{\vec{L}=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{i=n}{(\vec{r}_i\times \vec{p}_i)}}$
2. In this equation, $\mathbf\small{(\vec{r}_i\times \vec{p}_i)}$ is the angular momentum of a single particle (the ith particle)
• Also recall that the angular momentum of a single particle is denoted by '$\mathbf\small{\vec{l}}$'
• So the angular momentum of the ith particle is denoted by '$\mathbf\small{\vec{l}}$'
• That is., $\mathbf\small{\vec{l}_i=(\vec{r}_i\times \vec{p}_i)}$  
3. We will consider that typical particle first.
• That is., we will find the '$\mathbf\small{\vec{l}_i}$ of a typical particle about a fixed axis' first
• Then we will sum up the angular momenta of all the particles to get the $\mathbf\small{\vec{L}}$ of the whole body
4. Consider again fig.7.79 that we saw in a previous section. It is shown again below:
Fig.7.79
• For the single particle (indicated by the red sphere), we have: $\mathbf\small{\vec{l}=\vec{r}\times \vec{p}}$
5. $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}}$ can be split up as: $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}=\vec{OC}+\vec{CP}}$
• So we get: $\mathbf\small{\vec{l}=(\vec{OC}+\vec{CP})\times \vec{p}}$
$\mathbf\small{\Rightarrow \vec{l}=\left(\vec{OC}\times \vec{p}+\vec{CP}\times \vec{p}\right)}$
• But $\mathbf\small{\vec{p}=m \times \vec{v}}$
• So we get: $\mathbf\small{\vec{l}=\left[\vec{OC}\times (m\,\vec{v})+\vec{CP}\times (m\,\vec{v})\right]}$
6. There are two terms on the right side
• Consider the first term: $\mathbf\small{\vec{OC}\times (m\,\vec{v})}$
• It is the cross product of two vectors: $\mathbf\small{\vec{OC}}$ and $\mathbf\small{(m\,\vec{v})}$
• Obviously the resulting vector will be perpendicular to $\mathbf\small{\vec{OC}}$
• The vector $\mathbf\small{\vec{OC}}$ is along the axis of rotation
• So the resulting vector from the first term is perpendicular to the axis of rotation
7. Consider the second term: $\mathbf\small{\vec{CP}\times (m\,\vec{v})}$
• $\mathbf\small{\vec{CP}}$ lies on the plane of the red circle 
• $\mathbf\small{(m\,\vec{v})}$ also lies on the plane of the red circle
• So the resulting vector will be perpendicular to the plane of the red circle
• That means, the resulting vector will be parallel to the axis of rotation
8. Let us calculate this 'parallel vector' obtained  from the second term: $\mathbf\small{\vec{CP}\times (m\,\vec{v})}$
• We will apply the cross product rule: $\mathbf\small{|(\vec{A}\times \vec{B})|=|\vec{A}|\times |\vec{B}|\times \sin \theta}$
• In the present case, we have:
    ♦ $\mathbf\small{|\vec{CP}|=r_\bot}$
    ♦ $\mathbf\small{|\vec{v}|=r_\bot\,|\vec{\omega}|}$
    ♦ Angle between the two vectors = 90o. So sin θ = sin 90 = 1
• Thus we get: $\mathbf\small{\left|\left(\vec{CP}\times (m\,\vec{v})\right)\right|=r_\bot \times (m\,r_\bot\,|\vec{\omega}|)\times 1}$
$\mathbf\small{\Rightarrow \left|\left(\vec{CP}\times (m\,\vec{v})\right)\right|=(m\,r_\bot^2\,|\vec{\omega}|)}$
9. This is the magnitude of the resulting vector of the second term
• We want the direction also
• We saw that, the resulting vector is parallel to the axis of rotation
    ♦ The axis of rotation is the z-axis
    ♦ The unit vector along the z-axis is $\mathbf\small{\hat{k}}$
• So we get:
The resulting vector from the second term is: $\mathbf\small{(m\,r_\bot^2\,|\vec{\omega}|)\hat{k}}$
10. Since this vector is parallel to the axis of rotation (the z-axis), we will denote it as $\mathbf\small{\vec{l}_z}$ 
• So we can write: $\mathbf\small{\vec{l}_z=(m\,r_\bot^2\,|\vec{\omega}|)\hat{k}}$
• So the result in (5) becomes: $\mathbf\small{\vec{l}=\vec{l}_z+\left(\vec{OC}\times (m\,\vec{v})\right)}$
11. This is a vector sum
• The first component $\mathbf\small{\vec{l}_z}$ is parallel to the axis of rotation
• The second component $\mathbf\small{\left(\vec{OC}\times (m\,\vec{v})\right)}$ is not parallel to the axis of rotation
• So the vector sum $\mathbf\small{\vec{l}=\vec{l}_z+\left(\vec{OC}\times (m\,\vec{v})\right)}$ is not parallel to the axis of rotation
12. We know that the angular velocity $\mathbf\small{\vec{\omega}}$ is parallel to the axis of rotation (See fig.7.78 in chapter 7.15)
• So we get an important result:
The angular velocity $\mathbf\small{\vec{\omega}}$ and angular momentum $\mathbf\small{\vec{l}}$ of a particle are not necessarily parallel
• A comparison with translational motion:
In translational motion we have:
Linear velocity $\mathbf\small{\vec{v}}$ and linear momentum $\mathbf\small{\vec{p}}$ are always parallel to each other

13. So we calculated the angular momentum of a single particle
• It is given by the expression in (10)
• Now we add the angular momenta of all the particles
• The sum will give the angular momentum $\mathbf\small{\vec{L}}$ of the whole body
14. So we can write:
$\mathbf\small{L=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{i=n}{\left(l_i \right)}}$
$\mathbf\small{\Rightarrow L=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{i=n}{\left(\vec{l}_{z(i)} \right)}+\sum\limits_{i=1}^{i=n}{\left(\vec{OC}_{(i)}\times (m_{(i)}\,\vec{v}_{(i)}) \right)}}$
Where:
• $\mathbf\small{\vec{l}_{z(i)}}$ is the 'angular momentum component' of the ith  parallel to the axis of rotation
• $\mathbf\small{\vec{OC}_{(i)}}$ is the vector between the two points:
    ♦ Origin O of the reference system
    ♦ Center C of the circle described by the ith particle
• $\mathbf\small{m_{(i)}}$ is the mass of the ith particle
• $\mathbf\small{\vec{v}_{(i)}}$ is the linear velocity of the ith particle
15. Thus we see that, L also has two components
Consider the first component: $\mathbf\small{\sum\limits_{i=1}^{i=n}{\left(\vec{l}_{z(i)} \right)}}$
• All vectors involved in this summation are parallel to the z-axis (axis of rotation)
• So the result of the summation will be parallel to the z-axis
• So we will denote this component as $\mathbf\small{\vec{L}_z}$
16. Consider the second component: $\mathbf\small{\sum\limits_{i=1}^{i=n}{\left(\vec{OC}_{(i)}\times (m_{(i)}\,\vec{v}_{(i)}) \right)}}$
• All vectors involved in this summation are perpendicular to the z-axis. We know the reason:
    ♦ The vector product $\mathbf\small{\vec{OC}_{(i)}\times (m_{(i)}\,\vec{v}_{(i)})}$ will be perpendicular to $\mathbf\small{\vec{OC}_{(i)}}$  
    ♦ $\mathbf\small{\vec{OC}_{(i)}}$ lies along the z-axis
• So the result of the summation will be perpendicular to the z-axis
• So we will denote this component as $\mathbf\small{\vec{L}_\bot}$
17. Thus we can write:
Eq.7.30:
$\mathbf\small{\vec{L}=\vec{L}_z+\vec{L}_\bot}$
• Let us consider each component separately:
We have: $\mathbf\small{\vec{L}_z=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{i=n}{\left(\vec{l}_{z(i)} \right)}}$
• But from (10), we have: $\mathbf\small{\vec{l}_{z(i)}=(m_{(i)}\,r_{\bot (i)}^2\,|\vec{\omega}|)\hat{k}}$
• So, when we take the summation $\mathbf\small{\sum\limits_{i=1}^{i=n}{\left(\vec{l}_{z(i)} \right)}}$,
We are actually taking the summation: $\mathbf\small{\sum\limits_{i=1}^{i=n}{(m_{(i)}\,r_{\bot (i)}^2\,|\vec{\omega}|)\hat{k}}}$
• $\mathbf\small{|\vec{\omega}|\hat{k}}$ is the same for all particles. So it can be taken outside
• So we get: $\mathbf\small{\sum\limits_{i=1}^{i=n}{\left(\vec{l}_{z(i)} \right)}=|\vec{\omega}|\,\hat{k}\sum\limits_{i=1}^{i=n}{(m_{(i)}\,r_{\bot (i)}^2)}}$
18. But $\mathbf\small{\sum\limits_{i=1}^{i=n}{(m_{(i)}\,r_{\bot (i)}^2)}}$ = I, the moment of inertia of the whole body (Eq.7.25 in chapter 7.23)
So we get: $\mathbf\small{\vec{L}_z=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{i=n}{\left(\vec{l}_{z(i)} \right)}=I|\vec{\omega}|\,\hat{k}}$
19. Now consider the second component: $\mathbf\small{\vec{L}_\bot=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{i=n}{\left(\vec{OC}_{(i)}\times (m_{(i)}\,\vec{v}_{(i)}) \right)}}$
• This is a summation of vectors
• Each of those vectors results from the 'vector multiplication' of two vectors: $\mathbf\small{\vec{OC}_{(i)}\;\;\rm{and}\;\; (m_{(i)}\,\vec{v}_{(i)})}$
Let us see an example:
(i) Consider the square rod shown in fig.7.136 (a) below:
Fig.7.136
• It is rotating about the axis shown in blue color
• The direction of rotation is indicated by the yellow curved arrow
• It is a uniform square rod. Also, the blue axis passes through the exact center of the rod
(ii) A particle is isolated at position 'P' along the rod
• It is shown in red color
• Let us write the properties of that particle:
    ♦ $\mathbf\small{\vec{OC}_{(i)}=\vec{OC}}$
    ♦ $\mathbf\small{m_{(i)}=m_P}$
    ♦ $\mathbf\small{\vec{v}_{(i)}=\vec{v}_{(P)}}$
• So for the particle at P, we can easily calculate the cross product of $\mathbf\small{\vec{OC}_{(i)}\;\;\rm{and}\;\; (m_{(i)}\,\vec{v}_{(i)})}$
(iii) For the particle at P, there will be an exact replica on the other side of the axis
• This particle is at Q
(An exact replica is obtained because, the square rod is uniform and also, the axis passes through the exact center)
• The position of Q will be such that, CQ = CP 
• Let us write the properties of the particle at Q:
    ♦ $\mathbf\small{\vec{OC}_{(i)}=\vec{OC}}$
    ♦ $\mathbf\small{m_{(i)}=m_Q}$
    ♦ $\mathbf\small{\vec{v}_{(i)}=\vec{v}_{(Q)}}$
• So for the particle at Q also, we can easily calculate the cross product of $\mathbf\small{\vec{OC}_{(i)}\;\;\rm{and}\;\; (m_{(i)}\,\vec{v}_{(i)})}$
(iv) Let us write a comparison of properties:
• For both the particles, $\mathbf\small{\vec{OC}_{(i)}=\vec{OC}}$
• Because of the symmetry, $\mathbf\small{m_{(P)}=m_Q}$  
• Because of the symmetry, the magnitudes of $\mathbf\small{\vec{v}_{(P)}\;\;\rm{and}\;\; \vec{v}_{(Q)}}$ will be the same
    ♦ But their directions will be exactly opposite to each other
(v) Consider the two cross products:
(a) Cross product of $\mathbf\small{\vec{OC}_{(P)}\;\;\rm{and}\;\; (m_{(P)}\,\vec{v}_{(P)})}$ 
(b) Cross product of $\mathbf\small{\vec{OC}_{(Q)}\;\;\rm{and}\;\; (m_{(Q)}\,\vec{v}_{(Q)})}$ 
• The 'vector obtained as the cross product in (a)' will be equal and opposite to the 'vector obtained as the cross product in (b)'
• So in the summation, the two vectors will cancel each other
(vi) For each particle in the rod, there will be an exact replica on the other side of the axis
• So all particles in the rod, can be grouped into pairs such that:
• In any pair, one member is the exact replica of the other
(vii) If we draw a circle with center at C and passing through P,
    ♦ The point Q will also lie on the circle
    ♦ The point Q qill be diametrically opposite to P
• This is true for all symmetric bodies
• The members of the pairs will lie diametrically opposite on the circle with center at C
(vii) So the net result is that, the summation $\mathbf\small{\vec{L}_\bot=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{i=n}{\left(\vec{OC}_{(i)}\times (m_{(i)}\,\vec{v}_{(i)}) \right)}}$ will become zero 
• That means $\mathbf\small{\vec{L}_\bot=0}$
20. So the result in (1) becomes: $\mathbf\small{\vec{L}=\vec{L}_z}$
• But for this simplification, two conditions should be satisfied:
(i) The object must be uniform and symmetric
(ii) The rotation must be about the axis of symmetry
• For our present discussion we consider only those rotations which satisfy the two conditions
• So we can confidently use the simplified form
We can write:
Eq.7.31:
For symmetric rotation of symmetric bodies, $\mathbf\small{\vec{L}=I|\vec{\omega}|\,\hat{k}}$

Let us write a summary about the above discussion:
 In chap 7.17, we obtained the general equation for the angular momentum of any object:
Eq.7.20: $\mathbf\small{\vec{L}=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{i=n}{(\vec{r}_i\times \vec{p}_i)}}$

■ In the present section, we applied it to objects which rotate about a fixed axis. We obtained:
Eq.7.30:

$\mathbf\small{\vec{L}=\vec{L}_z+\vec{L}_\bot}$
■ Also, we applied it to symmetric objects which rotate symmetrically about a fixed axis. We obtained:
Eq.7.31:
For symmetric rotation of symmetric bodies, $\mathbf\small{\vec{L}=I|\vec{\omega}|\,\hat{k}}$

In the next section, we will see applications of Eq.7.30



PREVIOUS           CONTENTS          NEXT

Copyright©2019 Higher Secondary Physics. blogspot.in - All Rights Reserved

Thursday, June 13, 2019

Chapter 7.29 - Work done by a Torque

In the previous sectionwe saw how the 3D problem of 'rotation about a fixed axis' can be represented using a 2D plane. Based on that, in this section we will see work done by a torque

1. Consider a rigid body rotating about a fixed axis
• Let the z-axis be the fixed axis (see fig.7.132.a below)
Fig.7.132
• A horizontal plane is also shown in the fig.a
    ♦ It is shown in red color
    ♦ It is parallel to the xy plane
2. Cut the body by that horizontal plane. This is shown in fig.b
    ♦ Now the body is separated into an upper part and a lower part
• Remove the upper part 
• Remove the plane also. This is shown in fig.7.133(a) below:
Fig.7.133
• A new x' axis, which is parallel to the original x-axis of the reference frame can be drawn
    ♦ This x' axis lies on the 'top surface of lower part' 
• A new y' axis, which is parallel to the original y-axis of the reference frame can also be drawn
    ♦ This y' axis also lies on the 'top surface of lower part' 
• They are shown in fig.7.133(b) above
3. Look at the lower part from above
    ♦ We will get a 2D view of the 'top surface of lower part'. It is shown in fig.7.134(a) below:
Fig.7.134
• This 2d view of the 'top surface of lower part' is called the cross section of the body   
• The 'top surface of lower part' coincides with the new x’y’ plane
• All particles on that top surface will be moving in circular paths
• We can assume that the x’y’ plane coincides with the plane of the computer screen
• The z-axis appears as a small blue circle
    ♦ The z-axis is perpendicular to the computer screen 
4. The body consists of a large number of particles: P1P2, P3, . . . ,Pn
• Let us isolate one particle on the x'y' plane. We will call it P1
    ♦ It is shown as a small yellow circle. It's path is shown in pink color
• In the fig.7.134(a), the full path of P1 is not shown. Rather, a portion of the path is shown as the pink arc
5. Let a force $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_1}$ (lying on the x'y' plane) act on the particle P1 when it is at A
• This $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_1}$ lies on the plane x’y’ so we must take it into account
6. As a result of the force, the particle reaches B
• The angle turned by P is θ
• The distance traveled by P is the arc length AB
• We want this arc length
• We have: $\mathbf\small{\text{Angle}=\frac{\text{Arc}}{\text{Radius}}}$
$\mathbf\small{\Rightarrow \text{Arc}=\text{Radius}\times \text{Angle}}$
7. The position vector of P1 (with respect to origin O which is not shown in fig.7.134) when it is at A is $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_1}$
• It’s perpendicular component $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_{(\bot)1}}$ will lie on the x’y’ plane
• So radius of the arc = $\mathbf\small{|\vec{r}_{(\bot)1}|}$ 
• Thus we get: Arc length AB = $\mathbf\small{|\vec{r}_{(\bot)1}|\;\theta}$
8. Now consider the same situation when θ is very small. We will indicate that 'small value of  θ' as dθ. This is shown in fig.b
• If dθ is very small, the arc length AB will be equal to the straight line distance between A and B
• Using the result in (7), we get:
Straight line distance AB = Arc length AB = $\mathbf\small{|\vec{r}_{(\bot)1}|\;d\theta}$
9. Let us denote the straight line distance between A and B as $\mathbf\small{ds_1}$
• Then the result in (8) becomes:
$\mathbf\small{ds_1}$ = Arc length AB = $\mathbf\small{|\vec{r}_{(\bot)1}|\;d\theta}$
10. But straight line distance AB is the displacement from A to B
• Displacement is a vector. We must denote it as $\mathbf\small{\vec{ds}_1}$
• So magnitude of the displacement will be denoted as: $\mathbf\small{|\vec{ds}_1|}$ 
• Thus the result in (9) becomes:
$\mathbf\small{|\vec{ds}_1|=|\vec{r}_{(\bot)1}|\;d\theta}$
11. We have two items:
(i) Force acting on the particle P1. It is $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_1}$ 
(ii) Displacement suffered by the particle P1. It is $\mathbf\small{\vec{ds}_1}$ 
• With those two items, we can calculate the work done by the $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_1}$ on the particle
• We will denote this work as $\mathbf\small{dW_1}$
• 'Work done' is obtained as a dot product. The result is a scalar
• So we have: $\mathbf\small{dW_1=\vec{F}_1.\vec{ds}_1}$
12. To evaluate this dot product, we need the angle between $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_1}$ and $\mathbf\small{\vec{ds}_1}$
• In fig.b, we know that AB can be considered as a straight line
    ♦ We know the reason: dθ is very small
• The direction of AB is in fact the direction of $\mathbf\small{\vec{ds}_1}$
• AB is extended upwards. This is the cyan line    
• Angle between the cyan line and $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_1}$ is our required angle. It is denoted as Φ1
■So the result in (11) becomes: $\mathbf\small{dW_1=|\vec{F}_1|\times |\vec{ds}_1|\times \cos \phi_1}$
13. In fig.b, we know that B is very close to A. 
    ♦ We know the reason: dθ is very small  
• So, the straight line AB is in fact, the tangent at A
• The cyan line is the extension of AB. So cyan line is the tangent at A
• OA is the radius drawn through A
• OA is extended upto A'. So OA' is an extension of radius
14. So we have two items:
(i) The tangent at A   
(ii) The radius through A
• These two will be perpendicular to each other. That means, the angle between OA' and the cyan line is 90o
• So we get: $\mathbf\small{(\phi_1+\alpha_1)=90^o}$
$\mathbf\small{\Rightarrow \phi_1=(90-\alpha_1)}$
$\mathbf\small{\Rightarrow \cos \phi_1=\cos (90-\alpha_1)=\sin \alpha_1}$
    ♦ Where $\mathbf\small{\alpha_1}$ is the angle between $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_1}$ and OA'
• So the result in (12) becomes: $\mathbf\small{dW_1=|\vec{F}_1|\times |\vec{ds}_1|\times \sin \alpha_1}$
15. Substituting for $\mathbf\small{|\vec{ds}_1|}$ from (10), we get:
$\mathbf\small{dW_1=|\vec{F}_1|\times \left(|\vec{r}_{(\bot)1}|\;d\theta\right)\times \sin \alpha_1}$
• Rearranging this, we get:
$\mathbf\small{dW_1=\left[|\vec{F}_1|\times |\vec{r}_{(\bot)1}|\times \sin \alpha_1 \right]\;d\theta}$
16. Inside the square brackets, there are 3 items:
(i) Magnitude of $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_1}$
(ii) Magnitude of $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_{(\bot)1}}$
(iii) sine of the angle between $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_1}$ and $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_{(\bot)1}}$
• When those 3 items are multiplied, obviously, we get the magnitude of the cross product: ($\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_1 \times\vec{r}_{(\bot)1}}$)
• That means, what we have inside the square brackets is: $\mathbf\small{|(\vec{F}_1 \times\vec{r}_{(\bot)1})|}$
So the result in (15) becomes: $\mathbf\small{dW_1=\left[|(\vec{F}_1 \times\vec{r}_{(\bot)1})|\right]\;d\theta}$
17. But $\mathbf\small{(\vec{F}_1 \times\vec{r}_{(\bot)1})}$ is the torque created by $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_1}$ about the axis
• We will denote this torque as $\mathbf\small{\vec{\tau}_1}$
• Thus we can write: $\mathbf\small{(\vec{F}_1 \times\vec{r}_{(\bot)1})=\vec{\tau}_1}$
$\mathbf\small{\Rightarrow |(\vec{F}_1 \times\vec{r}_{(\bot)1})|=|\vec{\tau}_1|}$
• So the result in (16) becomes: $\mathbf\small{dW_1=\left[|\vec{\tau}_1|\right]\;d\theta}$
■ On the left side of the above equation, we have:
• work done on the particle P1
    ♦ Work done is a scalar
■ On the right side we have:
(i) Magnitude of the torque
    ♦ It is a scalar
(ii) Angle turned (with respect to the axis) by the particle
    ♦ It is also a scalar
• Product of two scalars is a scalar. So we have scalars on either side of the equation
18. So we can write:
• Work done on a particle at any instant is equal to the product of two items:
(i) The torque experienced by the particle at that instant
(ii) The angle through which the particle turned at that instant

19. We have considered only one particle (P1) in the body
• The force acting on that particle is $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_1}$
• The radial distance of that particle from the axis is $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_{(\bot)1}}$
• The magnitude of the torque experienced by that particle is $\mathbf\small{|\vec{\tau}_1|}$ 
• The angle through which that particle turned is $\mathbf\small{d\theta}$ 
• The work done ($\mathbf\small{dW_1}$) on that particle is given by: $\mathbf\small{dW_1=|\vec{\tau}_1|\;d\theta}$
20 There may be lots of other forces acting on the body:
    ♦ $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_2}$ at P2
    ♦ $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_3}$ at P3
    ♦ $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_4}$ at P4
    ♦ so on . . .
• Each of those particles will be having it's own radial distance from the axis:
    ♦ P2 is at a radial distance of $\mathbf\small{|\vec{r}_{(\bot)2}|}$ 
    ♦ P3 is at a radial distance of $\mathbf\small{|\vec{r}_{(\bot)3}|}$
    ♦ P4 is at a radial distance of $\mathbf\small{|\vec{r}_{(\bot)4}|}$
    ♦ so on . . .
• Those particles will experience torques:
    ♦ P2 experiences $\mathbf\small{\vec{\tau}_2}$ 
    ♦ P3 experiences $\mathbf\small{\vec{\tau}_3}$
    ♦ P4 experiences $\mathbf\small{\vec{\tau}_4}$
    ♦ so on . . .
• We can calculate work done on each particle:
    ♦ Work done by $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_2}$ on P2 is given by: $\mathbf\small{dW_2=|\vec{\tau}_2|\;d\theta}$
    ♦ Work done by $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_3}$ on P3 is given by: $\mathbf\small{dW_3=|\vec{\tau}_3|\;d\theta}$
    ♦ Work done by $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_4}$ on P4 is given by: $\mathbf\small{dW_4=|\vec{\tau}_4|\;d\theta}$
    ♦ so on . . .
21. So total work done by all the forces 
$\mathbf\small{dW_1+dW_2+dW_3+\;.\;.\;.\;+dW_n}$
= $\mathbf\small{|\vec{\tau}_1|\;d\theta+|\vec{\tau}_2|\;d\theta+|\vec{\tau}_3|\;d\theta\;+\;.\;.\;.\;+\;|\vec{\tau}_n|\;d\theta}$
$\mathbf\small{\left(|\vec{\tau}_1|+|\vec{\tau}_2|+|\vec{\tau}_3|\;+\;.\;.\;.\;+\;|\vec{\tau}_n|\right)\;d\theta}$
Two points may be noted here:
(i) dθ is same for all particles because, all particles in the body will turn through the same angle. So it can be taken outside the brackets
(ii) Inside the brackets, we are simply adding the 'magnitudes of the torques' algebraically. This is possible because, all the torques are aligned along the axis. We saw this in the previous section
22. Let us denote the total work done by all the forces as $\mathbf\small{dW}$
• Also let us denote the algebraic sum of all the 'torque magnitudes' as $\mathbf\small{|\vec{\tau}|}$
• Then the result in (21) becomes: $\mathbf\small{dW=|\vec{\tau}|\;d\theta}$
    ♦ Where $\mathbf\small{|\vec{\tau}|}$ is the net external torque acting on the body
23. So we can write:
(i) Work done on a body in rotational motion about a fixed axis is given by:
Eq.7.27: $\mathbf\small{dW=|\vec{\tau}|\;d\theta}$
    ♦ In the right side, we have: Torque times angular displacement  
(ii) In the previous chapter we saw:
Work done on a body in translational motion = $\mathbf\small{dW=|\vec{F}|\;ds}$
    ♦ In the right side, we have: Force times linear displacement  
• The two expressions are similar

Once we obtain the work done, we can discuss about power. We will see it in the next section

PREVIOUS           CONTENTS          NEXT

Copyright©2019 Higher Secondary Physics. blogspot.in - All Rights Reserved

Sunday, April 28, 2019

Chapter 7.13 - Mirror Image of a Vector

In the previous sectionwe saw the six terms in the cross product. In this section we will see a tabular form, which helps to obtain those six terms easily. Later in this section, we will also see reflected vectors and distributive law

1. Consider the table shown below:

• There is a 'header column on the left' + 3 additional columns
• There is a 'header row at top' + 3 additional rows
■ The header column is for writing the components of the first vector $\mathbf\small{\vec{a}}$ 
■ The header row is for writing the components of the second vector $\mathbf\small{\vec{b}}$.
2. The combinations are written inside the red box
• There are a total of 9 combinations possible
• But those coming diagonally are obtained from similar components. They are related to scalar product. They must not be used for vector product. Hence a '❌' mark is given to show that, those diagonal combinations are prohibited
• Such an elimination leaves 6 combinations
3. The signs of the combinations are also given
    ♦ An example: In the combination between row 1 and column 3, we have: $\mathbf\small{\hat{i}\times \hat{k}=-\hat{j}}$
• There are 3 positive and 3 negative combinations
• However, the final sign will depend also on the 'signs of the coefficients in the given vectors'

Let us see an example to demonstrate the application of the table:
• Find the vector product of $\mathbf\small{\vec{a}=3\hat{i}-4\hat{j}+5\hat{k}}$ and $\mathbf\small{\vec{b}=-2\hat{i}+\hat{j}-3\hat{k}}$
Solution:
1. The table is shown below:
• We get: $\mathbf\small{\vec{a}\times\vec{b}=(-5+12)\hat{i}+(-10+9)\hat{j}+(-8+3)\hat{k}}$
$\mathbf\small{\Rightarrow \vec{a}\times\vec{b}=7\hat{i}-\hat{j}-5\hat{k}}$
2. Table for the reverse multiplication $\mathbf\small{\vec{b}\times\vec{a}}$ can also be formed:
• We get: $\mathbf\small{\vec{b}\times\vec{a}=(5-12)\hat{i}+(10-9)\hat{j}+(8-3)\hat{k}}$
$\mathbf\small{\Rightarrow \vec{a}\times\vec{b}=-7\hat{i}+\hat{j}+5\hat{k}}$
■ We see that: $\mathbf\small{(\vec{a}\times\vec{b})=-(\vec{b}\times\vec{a})}$


Another method for obtaining the 6 terms:
• If we are familiar with determinants, we can use it for vector cross products
• Consider the formula given below:
$\mathbf\small{\vec{a}\times \vec{b}=\left| \begin{matrix} \hat{i} & \hat{j} & \hat{k} \\ a_{x} & a_{y} & a_{z} \\ b_{x} & b_{y} & b_{z} \end{matrix} \right| }$
• If we expand the determinant on the right side, we will get the 6 terms. The reader may try this method also

Mirror image of a vector

1. Suppose that, we have a vector $\mathbf\small{\vec{a}=a_x\,\hat{i}+a_y\,\hat{j}+a_z\,\hat{k}}$  
• The magnitudes of the components are ax, ay and az
• Fig.7.67(a) below shows how the 3 components help to define $\mathbf\small{\vec{a}}$ 

2. $\mathbf\small{\vec{a}}$ is shown in magenta color
• The red line indicates ax
• The green line indicates ay
• The blue line indicates az
3. Each of the above 3 lines are indispensable. For example, the green line has a definite length. But it is useless if we do not know where to place it. It's position is given by the red line
• Also remember that, the lengths of the red, green and blue lines are the coordinates (x,y,z) of the tip of the magenta vector $\mathbf\small{\vec{a}}$. That is: (x,y,z) = (ax, ay, az
4. Now we will see the 'mirror image' of $\mathbf\small{\vec{a}}$
• For that, we change the sign of the components
    ♦ ax will become -ax
    ♦ ay will become -ay
    ♦ az will become -az.
• These new components are shown in fig.7.67(b) above
• An example: -ax is on the negative side of y-axis because, it has to be at a distance -ay of from the x axis 
• In this way, each new component should be accurately positioned
5. When those positions are finalized, we get the tip of the 'mirror image' of $\mathbf\small{\vec{a}}$
• The coordinates of this new tip will obviously be (-x,-y,-z)
• Also we have: (x,y,z) = (-ax, -ay, -az)
■ We see the following 3 facts:
(i) The new vector falls on the same line as $\mathbf\small{\vec{a}}$
(ii) The new vector has the same magnitude as $\mathbf\small{\vec{a}}$
[∵ distance between O and (ax, ay, az= distance between O and (-ax, -ay, -az)]
(iii) The new vector has the direction opposite to that of $\mathbf\small{\vec{a}}$
■ So we can write: The new vector, which is the mirror image, is $\mathbf\small{-\vec{a}}$
• Usually, we denote the mirror image of $\mathbf\small{\vec{a}}$ as $\mathbf\small{\vec{a}'}$
■ So we can write: $\mathbf\small{\vec{a}'=-\vec{a}}$

In the above example, the tail end of $\mathbf\small{\vec{a}}$ is at the origin O. So calculations were easy. Now, in fig.7.68(a) below, the tail end is away from 'O'
Fig.7.68
We will write the steps:
1. The red, green and blue lines of the tail end are drawn. They have lengths x1, y1 and z1 respectively. So the coordinates of the tail end are (x1, y1, z1)
• The red, green and blue lines of the head are drawn. They have lengths x2, y2 and z2 respectively. So the coordinates of the head are (x2, y2, z2)
2. So we can write the components of $\mathbf\small{\vec{a}}$
    ♦ Magnitude of the x-component = ax = (x2 x1)
    ♦ Magnitude of the y-component = ay = (y2 - y1)
    ♦ Magnitude of the z-component = az = (z2 - z1)
• These are shown as red, blue and green dashed lines in fig.7.68(b)
3. So how do we obtain the mirror image of $\mathbf\small{\vec{a}}$ ?
Ans: First, let us change the signs of both the coordinates 
• Thus:
    ♦ (x1, y1, z1will become (-x1, -y1, -z1)
    ♦ (x2, y2, z2will become (-x2, -y2, -z2)
4. We get a new tail end and a new head end. The vector drawn between these new head and tail is shown in fig.7.69 below:
Fig.7.69
• Now we can write the components of this new vector:
• Magnitude of the x-component of the new vector = [(-x2 - (-x1)] = [x1 x2] 
• But we saw that:
    ♦ Magnitude of the x-component of the original vector = ax = (x2 x1)
    ♦ There is only a difference in sign
• That is: Magnitude of the x-component of the new vector = -ax
Similarly we can write:
• Magnitude of the y-component of the new vector = [(-y2 - (-y1)] = [y1 - y2] = -ay
• Magnitude of the z-component of the new vector = [(-z2 - (-z1)] = [z1 - z2] = -az
• They are shown in fig.7.70 below:
Fig.7.70
5. So it is clear that:
• To obtain the mirror image of any vector, all we need to do is, change the sign of each component.
• That is: Mirror image of $\mathbf\small{a_x\,\hat{i}+a_y\,\hat{j}+a_z\,\hat{k}}$ is $\mathbf\small{-a_x\,\hat{i}-a_y\,\hat{j}-a_z\,\hat{k}}$
• But $\mathbf\small{-a_x\,\hat{i}-a_y\,\hat{j}-a_z\,\hat{k}=-(a_x\,\hat{i}+a_y\,\hat{j}+a_z\,\hat{k})=-\vec{a}}$
• That means: Mirror image of $\mathbf\small{\vec{a}}$ = $\mathbf\small{\vec{a}'=-\vec{a}}$

So we have seen two cases:
Case 1: The tail end of the vector is at O 
Case 2: The tail end of the vector is away from O
In both cases, we see that: $\mathbf\small{\vec{a}'=-\vec{a}}$

Now we will see an interesting case:
• Given two vectors $\mathbf\small{\vec{a}}$ and $\mathbf\small{\vec{b}}$
• We know how to find ($\mathbf\small{\vec{a}\times\vec{b}}$)
• What about ($\mathbf\small{\vec{a}'\times\vec{b}'}$)?
Solution:
1. We have: $\mathbf\small{\vec{a}'\times\vec{b}'=-\vec{a}\times-\vec{b}}$
• We know that:
    ♦ $\mathbf\small{\vec{a}}$ lies along the same line as $\mathbf\small{-\vec{a}}$
    ♦ $\mathbf\small{\vec{b}}$ lies along the same line as $\mathbf\small{-\vec{b}}$
This is shown in fig.7.71(a) below:
Fig.7.71
2. So all the four vectors can be brought together to a single point on the same plane as shown in fig.7.71(b) above
• We find that:
Angle between $\mathbf\small{\vec{a}}$ and $\mathbf\small{\vec{b}}$ = Angle between $\mathbf\small{-\vec{a}}$ and $\mathbf\small{-\vec{b}}$ 
(∵ they are opposite angles)
3. Once we get that angle between $\mathbf\small{-\vec{a}}$ and $\mathbf\small{-\vec{b}}$, we can find the cross product:
• $\mathbf\small{|(-\vec{a}\times-\vec{b})|=|-\vec{a}|\times |-\vec{b}|\times \sin \theta}$
$\mathbf\small{\Rightarrow |(-\vec{a}\times-\vec{b})|=|\vec{a}|\times |\vec{b}|\times \sin \theta}$
4. But $\mathbf\small{|\vec{a}|\times |\vec{b}|\times \sin \theta=|(\vec{a}\times \vec{b})|}$
• Thus we get: $\mathbf\small{|(-\vec{a}\times-\vec{b})|=|(\vec{a}\times \vec{b})|}$
5. But $\mathbf\small{|(-\vec{a}\times-\vec{b})|=|(\vec{a}'\times \vec{b}')|}$
• Thus we get: $\mathbf\small{|(\vec{a}'\times \vec{b}')|=|(\vec{a}\times \vec{b})|}$
■ That is., 
Magnitude of the cross product of two vectors = Magnitude of the cross product of their mirror images  
6. Now we want directions:
In fig.7.71(b), we see the following information:
(i) To find the direction of $\mathbf\small{(\vec{a}\times \vec{b})}$, we would turn the screw from $\mathbf\small{\vec{a}}$ to $\mathbf\small{\vec{b}}$  
(ii) This is the same direction in which we would turn the screw to find the direction of $\mathbf\small{(-\vec{a}\times -\vec{b})}$ 
(iii) So the screw will be moving in the same direction in both the cases
(iv) Thus we get: Direction of both the cross products are the same
7. Magnitudes and directions are the same. So we can write:
$\mathbf\small{(-\vec{a}\times -\vec{b})=(\vec{a}\times \vec{b})}$
Thus we get:
Eq.7.15:  $\mathbf\small{(\vec{a}'\times \vec{b}')=(\vec{a}\times \vec{b})}$

Distributive property of vector cross product

■ The cross product obeys distributive law
Proof:
1. We have to prove that: $\mathbf\small{\vec{a}\times(\vec{b}+\vec{c})=(\vec{a}\times \vec{b})+(\vec{a}\times \vec{c})}$
2. Let:
$\mathbf\small{\vec{a}=a_x\,\hat{i}+a_y\,\hat{j}+a_z\,\hat{k}}$
$\mathbf\small{\vec{b}=b_x\,\hat{i}+b_y\,\hat{j}+b_z\,\hat{k}}$
$\mathbf\small{\vec{c}=c_x\,\hat{i}+c_y\,\hat{j}+c_z\,\hat{k}}$
Then we get: $\mathbf\small{(\vec{b}+\vec{c})=(b_x+c_x)\,\hat{i}+(b_y+c_y)\,\hat{j}+(b_z+c_z)\,\hat{k}}$
3. On the L.H.S of (1), we have: $\mathbf\small{\vec{a}\times(\vec{b}+\vec{c})}$
This will become: $\mathbf\small{(a_x\,\hat{i}+a_y\,\hat{j}+a_z\,\hat{k})\times[(b_x+c_x)\,\hat{i}+(b_y+c_y)\,\hat{j}+(b_z+c_z)\,\hat{k}]}$
4. The cross product in (3) can be calculated using Table 1 below:
Table 1
• On the right side, the like terms are added together
• This completes our calculations on L.H.S of (1)
5. The R.H.S of (1) has two cross products
• The first one is $\mathbf\small{(\vec{a}\times \vec{b})}$
• This can be calculated using the Table 2 below:
Table.3

• On the right side, the like terms are added together
6. The second cross product in the R.H.S of (1) is $\mathbf\small{(\vec{a}\times \vec{c})}$
• This can be calculated using the Table 3 below:
Table 3
• On the right side, the like terms are added together
7. Now we examine the right sides of the 3 tables carefully. We find 3 facts:
(i) The $\mathbf\small{\hat{i}}$ component in Table 1 = ($\mathbf\small{\hat{i}}$ component in Table 2 + $\mathbf\small{\hat{i}}$ component in Table 3)
(ii) The $\mathbf\small{\hat{j}}$ component in Table 1 = ($\mathbf\small{\hat{j}}$ component in Table 2 + $\mathbf\small{\hat{j}}$ component in Table 3)
(iii) The $\mathbf\small{\hat{k}}$ component in Table 1 = ($\mathbf\small{\hat{k}}$ component in Table 2 + $\mathbf\small{\hat{k}}$ component in Table 3)
8. Thus we get:
L.H.S in (1) = R.H.S in (1)

In the next section, we will see some solved examples related to cross products

PREVIOUS           CONTENTS          NEXT

Copyright©2019 Higher Secondary Physics. blogspot.in - All Rights Reserved