Showing posts with label axis of rotation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label axis of rotation. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 19, 2019

Chapter 7.30 - Power derived from Torque

In the previous sectionwe saw work done by a torque. In this section, we will see power

1. We have: $\mathbf\small{dW=|\vec{\tau}|\;d\theta}$
• This is the work done in the time interval during which, the body turns through dθ
• Let this time interval be dt
• So dW joules of work is done in a time interval of dt seconds
2. Thus we get:
• Power (P) produced by the torque 
= Work done by the torque in 1 second 
$\mathbf\small{\frac{dW}{dt}=\frac{|\vec{\tau}|\;d\theta}{dt}=|\vec{\tau}|\left(\frac{d\theta}{dt}\right)}$
3. Consider the term $\mathbf\small{\left(\frac{d\theta}{dt}\right)}$
• Angular displacement is being divided by time. It will give angular velocity ω
• So the result in (2) becomes:
Eq.7.28$\mathbf\small{P=|\vec{\tau}|\omega}$

Now we will derive an interesting result related to rotational motion. But first, we will derive it for linear motion
1. A rigid body (of mass m) in linear motion, has an initial velocity of v1 ms-1
• A force F acts on it for a time interval of Δt seconds
    ♦ Direction of F is same as the direction of motion
• As a result, the velocity of the body increases to v2
• During the Δt seconds, the body undergoes a displacement of Δs  
2. Work done by the force = Force × displacement = $\mathbf\small{F\times \Delta s}$
3. Applying work-energy theorem, we can write:
• If no work is lost against friction or air resistance, all the work done by the force will be utilized to increase the kinetic energy of the body (Details here)
• Also note that, in this case, the body is rigid. So there is no internal motion of particles. All the external work will indeed be utilized for increasing the kinetic energy of the body
4. Now, increase in kinetic energy = $\mathbf\small{0.5m\,v_2^2-0.5m\,v_1^2=0.5m(v_2^2-v_1^2)}$ 
• Equating this to the result in (2), we get: $\mathbf\small{0.5m(v_2^2-v_1^2)=F\times \Delta s}$
5. Dividing both sides by Δt, we get: $\mathbf\small{\frac{0.5m(v_2^2-v_1^2)}{\Delta t}=\frac{F\times \Delta s}{\Delta t}=F\times\frac{\Delta s}{\Delta t}}$
6. $\mathbf\small{\frac{\Delta s}{\Delta t}}$ normally gives velocity
• But in our present case, the velocity is not uniform
    ♦ This is because of the action of the force F
    ♦ Because of the F, the body will be moving with an acceleration
• So $\mathbf\small{\frac{\Delta s}{\Delta t}}$ will give us the average velocity
• That means: $\mathbf\small{\frac{\Delta s}{\Delta t}=\frac{v_1+v_2}{2}}$
7. So the result in (5) becomes: $\mathbf\small{\frac{0.5m(v_2^2-v_1^2)}{\Delta t}=F\frac{(v_1+v_2)}{2}}$
$\mathbf\small{\Rightarrow \frac{0.5m(v_2+v_1)(v_2-v_1)}{\Delta t}=F\frac{(v_1+v_2)}{2}=0.5F(v_1+v_2)}$
$\mathbf\small{\Rightarrow \frac{0.5m(v_2-v_1)}{\Delta t}=0.5F}$
$\mathbf\small{\Rightarrow \frac{m(v_2-v_1)}{\Delta t}=F}$
8. But $\mathbf\small{\frac{(v_2-v_1)}{\Delta t}}$ is the acceleration a
• So the result in (7) becomes: $\mathbf\small{m\,a=F}$
• This is Newton's second law of motion

Thus, starting with the 'work done', we reached Newton's second law. We did it in the case of linear motion. Let us see if it is possible for rotational motion also:

1. A rigid body in rotational motion, has an initial angular velocity of ω1 rad s-1
• The moment of inertia of the body about the axis of rotation is I
• A torque 𝝉 acts on it for a time duration of Δt seconds
    ♦ As a result, the angular velocity of the body increases to ω2
• During the Δt seconds, the body undergoes an angular displacement of Δθ  
2. Work done by the torque 
= Torque × angular displacement 
$\mathbf\small{\tau \times \Delta \theta}$
3. The body is rigid. So there is no internal motion of particles. All the external work will be utilized for increasing the kinetic energy of the body
• We have:
Kinetic energy of a rotating body = $\mathbf\small{\frac{1}{2}I \omega^2=0.5I\,\omega^2}$ (see Eq.7.26
4. Now, increase in kinetic energy = $\mathbf\small{0.5I\,\omega_2^2-0.5I\,\omega_1^2=0.5I(\omega_2^2-\omega_1^2)}$ 
• Equating this to the result in (2), we get: $\mathbf\small{0.5I(\omega_2^2-\omega_1^2)=\tau \times \Delta \theta}$
5. Dividing both sides by Δt, we get: $\mathbf\small{\frac{0.5I(\omega_2^2-\omega_1^2)}{\Delta t}=\frac{\tau \times \Delta \theta}{\Delta t}=\tau \times\frac{\Delta \theta}{\Delta t}}$
6. $\mathbf\small{\frac{\Delta \theta}{\Delta t}}$ normally gives angular velocity
• But in our present case, the angular velocity is not uniform
    ♦ This is because of the action of the torque 𝝉 
    ♦ Because of the 𝝉, the body will be rotating with an acceleration
• So $\mathbf\small{\frac{\Delta \theta}{\Delta t}}$ will give us the average angular velocity
• That means: $\mathbf\small{\frac{\Delta \theta}{\Delta t}=\frac{\omega_1+\omega_2}{2}}$
7. So the result in (5) becomes: $\mathbf\small{\frac{0.5I(\omega_2^2-\omega_1^2)}{\Delta t}=\tau\frac{(\omega_1+\omega_2)}{2}}$
$\mathbf\small{\Rightarrow \frac{0.5I(\omega_2+\omega_1)(\omega_2-\omega_1)}{\Delta t}=\tau\frac{(\omega_1+\omega_2)}{2}=0.5\tau(\omega_1+\omega_2)}$
$\mathbf\small{\Rightarrow \frac{0.5I(\omega_2-\omega_1)}{\Delta t}=0.5\tau}$
$\mathbf\small{\Rightarrow \frac{I(\omega_2-\omega_1)}{\Delta t}=\tau}$
8. But $\mathbf\small{\frac{(\omega_2-\omega_1)}{\Delta t}}$ is the angular acceleration 𝜶
• So the result in (7) becomes:
Eq.7.29$\mathbf\small{I\,\alpha=\tau}$
9. '$\mathbf\small{I\,\alpha=\tau}$' is analogous to '$\mathbf\small{m\,a=F}$' of linear motion
• '$\mathbf\small{I\,\alpha=\tau}$' is called the Newton's second law for rotation about a fixed axis
• Thus, in the case of rotation (about a fixed axis) also, starting with the 'work done', we reached Newton's second law

Now we will see some solved examples

Solved example 7.33
A cord of negligible mass is wound round the rim of a fly wheel of mass 20 kg and radius 20 cm. A steady pull of 25 N is applied on the cord as shown in the fig.7.135 below. The fly wheel is mounted on a horizontal axle with frictionless bearings
(a) Compute the angular acceleration of the wheel
(b) Find the work done by the pull when 2 m of the chord is unwound
(c) Find also the kinetic energy of the wheel at this point
(d) compare answers of parts (b) and (c)
Fig.7.135

Solution:
1. Moment of inertia (I) of the fly wheel = $\mathbf\small{\frac{MR^2}{2}=\frac{(20)(0.2)^2}{2}=0.4\,\text{kg m}^2}$
(I of a circular disc about a perpendicular axis at center)    
2. Torque $\mathbf\small{\tau}$ acting on the wheel:
• The tension in the cord will pull a particle at the periphery of the wheel. So force on that particle will be 25 N
• This force will be tangential to the fly wheel
• We know this:
Perpendicular distance between a tangent from the center of circle (axis of rotation) = radius of the circle
• So we get:   
$\mathbf\small{\tau}$ = Force × perpendicular distance from center 
= Force × radius = 25 × 0.2 = 5 Nm
3. We have: $\mathbf\small{\tau=I\,\alpha}$
• Substituting known values, we get: $\mathbf\small{5=0.4\,\alpha}$
$\mathbf\small{\Rightarrow \alpha=\frac{5}{0.4}=12.5\,\text{rad s}^{-2}}$
• This is the answer for part (a)
4. Perimeter of the fly wheel = 2𝞹R = 2𝞹(0.2) = 0.4𝞹 m
• So 0.4𝞹 m of the circumference will cover 2𝞹 radians
• Then 1 m of the circumference will cover: $\mathbf\small{\frac{2 \pi}{0.4 \pi}=5}$ radians
• So 2 m of the cord will cover: 10 radians
■ Thus, when 2 m of the cord is unwound, the fly wheel will turn through 10 rad
5. We have: Work done = 𝞽 × dθ = 5 × 10 = 50 joules
• This is the answer for part (b)
6. Change in kinetic energy = $\mathbf\small{0.5I(\omega_2^2-\omega_1^2)}$
• Given that, the fly wheel starts from rest. So $\mathbf\small{\omega_1}$ = 0    
• Thus, change in kinetic energy = $\mathbf\small{0.5I \omega_2^2}$ 
7. We have: $\mathbf\small{\omega_2^2=\omega_1^2+2 \alpha \theta}$
• Substituting the values, we get: $\mathbf\small{\omega_2^2=0^2+2(12.5)(10)=250}$
8. Substituting the values in (6), we get:
• Change in kinetic energy = $\mathbf\small{0.5(0.4)(250)}$ = 50 joules
• This is the answer for part (c)
9. Comparing (b) and (c), we find that, the answers are the same
• That means:
Work done by the external torque = Increase in kinetic energy of the body
• We obtained this equality because, no work is lost against friction
• This is the answer for part (d)

Solved example 7.34
Torques of equal magnitude are applied to a hollow cylinder and a solid sphere, both having the same mass and radius. The cylinder is free to rotate about its standard axis of symmetry, and the sphere is free to rotate about an axis passing through its centre. Which of the two will acquire a greater angular speed after a given time.
Solution:
1. Standard axis of symmetry of a cylinder is it's axis
• I of a hollow cylinder about it's axis = $\mathbf\small{MR^2}$
• I of a solid sphere about an axis passing through it's center = $\mathbf\small{\frac{2MR^2}{5}}$ 
(Significance of 'passing through center' can be seen here )
2. Given that, the torques acting are equal. Let us denote it as $\mathbf\small{\tau}$ 
• Given that the masses are same. Let us denote it as M 
• Given that the radii are same. Let us denote it as R 
3. We have: $\mathbf\small{\tau=I\,\alpha}$
• Substituting the values for the hollow cylinder, we get: $\mathbf\small{\tau=MR^2\,\alpha_C}$
    ♦ Where $\mathbf\small{\alpha_C}$ is the angular acceleration of the cylinder
• Substituting the values for the solid sphere, we get: $\mathbf\small{\tau=\frac{2MR^2}{5}\,\alpha_S}$
    ♦ Where $\mathbf\small{\alpha_S}$ is the angular acceleration of the sphere
4. Since the torques are equal, we can equate them:
• $\mathbf\small{MR^2\,\alpha_C=\frac{2MR^2}{5}\,\alpha_S}$
$\mathbf\small{\Rightarrow \alpha_C=\frac{2}{5}\,\alpha_S}$
5. We see that, $\mathbf\small{\alpha_C}$ is only a fraction of $\mathbf\small{\alpha_S}$.
• That means $\mathbf\small{\alpha_C}$ is less than $\mathbf\small{\alpha_S}$ 
• So after a given time, the sphere will acquire a greater angular speed

Solved example 7.35
A rope of negligible mass is wound round a hollow cylinder of mass 3 kg and radius 40 cm. What is the angular acceleration of the cylinder if the rope is pulled with a force of 30 N ? What is the linear acceleration of the rope ? Assume that there is no slipping.
Solution:
1. I of a hollow cylinder about it's axis = $\mathbf\small{MR^2}$
2. Torque $\mathbf\small{\tau}$ acting on the wheel:
• The tension in the rope will pull a particle at the periphery of the cylinder
• So force on that particle will be 30 N
• This force will be tangential to the cylinder
• Perpendicular distance between a tangent from the center of circle (axis of rotation) = radius of the circle
• So we get: $\mathbf\small{\tau}$ = Force × perpendicular distance from center 
= Force × radius = 30 × 0.4 = 12 Nm
3. We have: $\mathbf\small{\tau=I\,\alpha}$
• Substituting the values, we get: $\mathbf\small{12=(3)(0.4)^2\,\alpha}$
$\mathbf\small{\Rightarrow \alpha=}$ 25 rad s-2
• This is the answer for part (i)
4. The cylinder starts from rest
• So initial angular velocity $\mathbf\small{\omega_0=0}$
5. Let us find the angular velocity after any convenient interval of time, say 2 s
• We have: $\mathbf\small{\omega=\omega_0+\alpha \, t}$
• Substituting the values, we get: $\mathbf\small{\omega=0+(25) \, (2)}$ = 50 rad s-1
6. So at the instant when the stop watch shows 2 seconds, the cylinder will be rotating with an angular speed of 50 rad s-1 
• Every particle in the cylinder will be rotating with the angular speed of 50 rad s-1 at that instant
• Any particle at the periphery will also be rotating with the angular speed of 50 rad s-1 at that instant
7. Now, we use the relation between linear velocity and angular velocity
• We have: $\mathbf\small{v=r\;\omega}$
• We apply it to a particle at the periphery: v = 0.4 × 50 = 20 ms-1.
• So, when the stop watch shows 2 seconds, any particle at the periphery will be moving with a linear speed of 20 ms-1.
8. Given that, there is no slip between the cylinder and the rope
• So the rope will also be moving with a linear speed of 20 ms-1
• We will use the relation $\mathbf\small{v=v_0+at}$
• The rope also started from rest. So $\mathbf\small{v_0=0}$
• Substituting the values, we get: 20= 0 + a × 2
⇒ a = 10 ms-2.

In the next section, we will see angular momentum

PREVIOUS           CONTENTS          NEXT

Copyright©2019 Higher Secondary Physics. blogspot.in - All Rights Reserved

Thursday, June 13, 2019

Chapter 7.29 - Work done by a Torque

In the previous sectionwe saw how the 3D problem of 'rotation about a fixed axis' can be represented using a 2D plane. Based on that, in this section we will see work done by a torque

1. Consider a rigid body rotating about a fixed axis
• Let the z-axis be the fixed axis (see fig.7.132.a below)
Fig.7.132
• A horizontal plane is also shown in the fig.a
    ♦ It is shown in red color
    ♦ It is parallel to the xy plane
2. Cut the body by that horizontal plane. This is shown in fig.b
    ♦ Now the body is separated into an upper part and a lower part
• Remove the upper part 
• Remove the plane also. This is shown in fig.7.133(a) below:
Fig.7.133
• A new x' axis, which is parallel to the original x-axis of the reference frame can be drawn
    ♦ This x' axis lies on the 'top surface of lower part' 
• A new y' axis, which is parallel to the original y-axis of the reference frame can also be drawn
    ♦ This y' axis also lies on the 'top surface of lower part' 
• They are shown in fig.7.133(b) above
3. Look at the lower part from above
    ♦ We will get a 2D view of the 'top surface of lower part'. It is shown in fig.7.134(a) below:
Fig.7.134
• This 2d view of the 'top surface of lower part' is called the cross section of the body   
• The 'top surface of lower part' coincides with the new x’y’ plane
• All particles on that top surface will be moving in circular paths
• We can assume that the x’y’ plane coincides with the plane of the computer screen
• The z-axis appears as a small blue circle
    ♦ The z-axis is perpendicular to the computer screen 
4. The body consists of a large number of particles: P1P2, P3, . . . ,Pn
• Let us isolate one particle on the x'y' plane. We will call it P1
    ♦ It is shown as a small yellow circle. It's path is shown in pink color
• In the fig.7.134(a), the full path of P1 is not shown. Rather, a portion of the path is shown as the pink arc
5. Let a force $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_1}$ (lying on the x'y' plane) act on the particle P1 when it is at A
• This $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_1}$ lies on the plane x’y’ so we must take it into account
6. As a result of the force, the particle reaches B
• The angle turned by P is θ
• The distance traveled by P is the arc length AB
• We want this arc length
• We have: $\mathbf\small{\text{Angle}=\frac{\text{Arc}}{\text{Radius}}}$
$\mathbf\small{\Rightarrow \text{Arc}=\text{Radius}\times \text{Angle}}$
7. The position vector of P1 (with respect to origin O which is not shown in fig.7.134) when it is at A is $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_1}$
• It’s perpendicular component $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_{(\bot)1}}$ will lie on the x’y’ plane
• So radius of the arc = $\mathbf\small{|\vec{r}_{(\bot)1}|}$ 
• Thus we get: Arc length AB = $\mathbf\small{|\vec{r}_{(\bot)1}|\;\theta}$
8. Now consider the same situation when θ is very small. We will indicate that 'small value of  θ' as dθ. This is shown in fig.b
• If dθ is very small, the arc length AB will be equal to the straight line distance between A and B
• Using the result in (7), we get:
Straight line distance AB = Arc length AB = $\mathbf\small{|\vec{r}_{(\bot)1}|\;d\theta}$
9. Let us denote the straight line distance between A and B as $\mathbf\small{ds_1}$
• Then the result in (8) becomes:
$\mathbf\small{ds_1}$ = Arc length AB = $\mathbf\small{|\vec{r}_{(\bot)1}|\;d\theta}$
10. But straight line distance AB is the displacement from A to B
• Displacement is a vector. We must denote it as $\mathbf\small{\vec{ds}_1}$
• So magnitude of the displacement will be denoted as: $\mathbf\small{|\vec{ds}_1|}$ 
• Thus the result in (9) becomes:
$\mathbf\small{|\vec{ds}_1|=|\vec{r}_{(\bot)1}|\;d\theta}$
11. We have two items:
(i) Force acting on the particle P1. It is $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_1}$ 
(ii) Displacement suffered by the particle P1. It is $\mathbf\small{\vec{ds}_1}$ 
• With those two items, we can calculate the work done by the $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_1}$ on the particle
• We will denote this work as $\mathbf\small{dW_1}$
• 'Work done' is obtained as a dot product. The result is a scalar
• So we have: $\mathbf\small{dW_1=\vec{F}_1.\vec{ds}_1}$
12. To evaluate this dot product, we need the angle between $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_1}$ and $\mathbf\small{\vec{ds}_1}$
• In fig.b, we know that AB can be considered as a straight line
    ♦ We know the reason: dθ is very small
• The direction of AB is in fact the direction of $\mathbf\small{\vec{ds}_1}$
• AB is extended upwards. This is the cyan line    
• Angle between the cyan line and $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_1}$ is our required angle. It is denoted as Φ1
■So the result in (11) becomes: $\mathbf\small{dW_1=|\vec{F}_1|\times |\vec{ds}_1|\times \cos \phi_1}$
13. In fig.b, we know that B is very close to A. 
    ♦ We know the reason: dθ is very small  
• So, the straight line AB is in fact, the tangent at A
• The cyan line is the extension of AB. So cyan line is the tangent at A
• OA is the radius drawn through A
• OA is extended upto A'. So OA' is an extension of radius
14. So we have two items:
(i) The tangent at A   
(ii) The radius through A
• These two will be perpendicular to each other. That means, the angle between OA' and the cyan line is 90o
• So we get: $\mathbf\small{(\phi_1+\alpha_1)=90^o}$
$\mathbf\small{\Rightarrow \phi_1=(90-\alpha_1)}$
$\mathbf\small{\Rightarrow \cos \phi_1=\cos (90-\alpha_1)=\sin \alpha_1}$
    ♦ Where $\mathbf\small{\alpha_1}$ is the angle between $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_1}$ and OA'
• So the result in (12) becomes: $\mathbf\small{dW_1=|\vec{F}_1|\times |\vec{ds}_1|\times \sin \alpha_1}$
15. Substituting for $\mathbf\small{|\vec{ds}_1|}$ from (10), we get:
$\mathbf\small{dW_1=|\vec{F}_1|\times \left(|\vec{r}_{(\bot)1}|\;d\theta\right)\times \sin \alpha_1}$
• Rearranging this, we get:
$\mathbf\small{dW_1=\left[|\vec{F}_1|\times |\vec{r}_{(\bot)1}|\times \sin \alpha_1 \right]\;d\theta}$
16. Inside the square brackets, there are 3 items:
(i) Magnitude of $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_1}$
(ii) Magnitude of $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_{(\bot)1}}$
(iii) sine of the angle between $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_1}$ and $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_{(\bot)1}}$
• When those 3 items are multiplied, obviously, we get the magnitude of the cross product: ($\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_1 \times\vec{r}_{(\bot)1}}$)
• That means, what we have inside the square brackets is: $\mathbf\small{|(\vec{F}_1 \times\vec{r}_{(\bot)1})|}$
So the result in (15) becomes: $\mathbf\small{dW_1=\left[|(\vec{F}_1 \times\vec{r}_{(\bot)1})|\right]\;d\theta}$
17. But $\mathbf\small{(\vec{F}_1 \times\vec{r}_{(\bot)1})}$ is the torque created by $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_1}$ about the axis
• We will denote this torque as $\mathbf\small{\vec{\tau}_1}$
• Thus we can write: $\mathbf\small{(\vec{F}_1 \times\vec{r}_{(\bot)1})=\vec{\tau}_1}$
$\mathbf\small{\Rightarrow |(\vec{F}_1 \times\vec{r}_{(\bot)1})|=|\vec{\tau}_1|}$
• So the result in (16) becomes: $\mathbf\small{dW_1=\left[|\vec{\tau}_1|\right]\;d\theta}$
■ On the left side of the above equation, we have:
• work done on the particle P1
    ♦ Work done is a scalar
■ On the right side we have:
(i) Magnitude of the torque
    ♦ It is a scalar
(ii) Angle turned (with respect to the axis) by the particle
    ♦ It is also a scalar
• Product of two scalars is a scalar. So we have scalars on either side of the equation
18. So we can write:
• Work done on a particle at any instant is equal to the product of two items:
(i) The torque experienced by the particle at that instant
(ii) The angle through which the particle turned at that instant

19. We have considered only one particle (P1) in the body
• The force acting on that particle is $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_1}$
• The radial distance of that particle from the axis is $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_{(\bot)1}}$
• The magnitude of the torque experienced by that particle is $\mathbf\small{|\vec{\tau}_1|}$ 
• The angle through which that particle turned is $\mathbf\small{d\theta}$ 
• The work done ($\mathbf\small{dW_1}$) on that particle is given by: $\mathbf\small{dW_1=|\vec{\tau}_1|\;d\theta}$
20 There may be lots of other forces acting on the body:
    ♦ $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_2}$ at P2
    ♦ $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_3}$ at P3
    ♦ $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_4}$ at P4
    ♦ so on . . .
• Each of those particles will be having it's own radial distance from the axis:
    ♦ P2 is at a radial distance of $\mathbf\small{|\vec{r}_{(\bot)2}|}$ 
    ♦ P3 is at a radial distance of $\mathbf\small{|\vec{r}_{(\bot)3}|}$
    ♦ P4 is at a radial distance of $\mathbf\small{|\vec{r}_{(\bot)4}|}$
    ♦ so on . . .
• Those particles will experience torques:
    ♦ P2 experiences $\mathbf\small{\vec{\tau}_2}$ 
    ♦ P3 experiences $\mathbf\small{\vec{\tau}_3}$
    ♦ P4 experiences $\mathbf\small{\vec{\tau}_4}$
    ♦ so on . . .
• We can calculate work done on each particle:
    ♦ Work done by $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_2}$ on P2 is given by: $\mathbf\small{dW_2=|\vec{\tau}_2|\;d\theta}$
    ♦ Work done by $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_3}$ on P3 is given by: $\mathbf\small{dW_3=|\vec{\tau}_3|\;d\theta}$
    ♦ Work done by $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}_4}$ on P4 is given by: $\mathbf\small{dW_4=|\vec{\tau}_4|\;d\theta}$
    ♦ so on . . .
21. So total work done by all the forces 
$\mathbf\small{dW_1+dW_2+dW_3+\;.\;.\;.\;+dW_n}$
= $\mathbf\small{|\vec{\tau}_1|\;d\theta+|\vec{\tau}_2|\;d\theta+|\vec{\tau}_3|\;d\theta\;+\;.\;.\;.\;+\;|\vec{\tau}_n|\;d\theta}$
$\mathbf\small{\left(|\vec{\tau}_1|+|\vec{\tau}_2|+|\vec{\tau}_3|\;+\;.\;.\;.\;+\;|\vec{\tau}_n|\right)\;d\theta}$
Two points may be noted here:
(i) dθ is same for all particles because, all particles in the body will turn through the same angle. So it can be taken outside the brackets
(ii) Inside the brackets, we are simply adding the 'magnitudes of the torques' algebraically. This is possible because, all the torques are aligned along the axis. We saw this in the previous section
22. Let us denote the total work done by all the forces as $\mathbf\small{dW}$
• Also let us denote the algebraic sum of all the 'torque magnitudes' as $\mathbf\small{|\vec{\tau}|}$
• Then the result in (21) becomes: $\mathbf\small{dW=|\vec{\tau}|\;d\theta}$
    ♦ Where $\mathbf\small{|\vec{\tau}|}$ is the net external torque acting on the body
23. So we can write:
(i) Work done on a body in rotational motion about a fixed axis is given by:
Eq.7.27: $\mathbf\small{dW=|\vec{\tau}|\;d\theta}$
    ♦ In the right side, we have: Torque times angular displacement  
(ii) In the previous chapter we saw:
Work done on a body in translational motion = $\mathbf\small{dW=|\vec{F}|\;ds}$
    ♦ In the right side, we have: Force times linear displacement  
• The two expressions are similar

Once we obtain the work done, we can discuss about power. We will see it in the next section

PREVIOUS           CONTENTS          NEXT

Copyright©2019 Higher Secondary Physics. blogspot.in - All Rights Reserved

Tuesday, May 7, 2019

Chapter 7.16 - Torque on a Particle

In the previous sectionwe saw the relation between linear velocity and angular velocity. In this section we will see torque

1. Consider a body in pure translational motion
 We know that, for that body, a force $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ is required to bring about a change in any of the following two states:
(i) State of rest
(ii) State of uniform motion
2. Now consider a body which is fixed along an axis. We know that, it cannot have translational motion. It can only have pure rotational motion
■ Can we write the same statement that we wrote in (1) here also?
3. Let us elaborate this question:
• The body under consideration can have rotation only. It can have two states:
(i) If it is rotating (with uniform $\mathbf\small{\vec{\omega}}$) about the axis, we say that it is in a ‘state of uniform rotation’
(ii) If $\mathbf\small{\vec{\omega}}$ is zero at any instant, we say that, it is in a ‘state of rest’
■ So the question is:
Can a force $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ bring about a change in the above two states?
4. To find the answer, we will see a common situation that we encounter in our day to day life:
(i) Consider the door of a room shown in fig.7.82(a) below:
Fig.7.82
• The left edge of the door is fixed using hinges
(ii) The door rotates about the hinges. So the hinges can be considered as the 'axis of rotation'
• It is shown in blue color
(iii) To open the door, we have to apply a force $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$
• This $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ vector is indicated in magenta color
(iv) In fig.a, $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ is applied at the hinges
• The door will not rotate. We will not be able to open the door
(v) In fig.b, the $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ is applied at a point between the outer edge and the axis
• This time, the door will rotate. But it is not the best way to open a door 
(vi) In fig.c, the $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ is applied exactly at the outer edge. We see that, $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ is inclined (at an acute angle) to the door
• This time also, the door will rotate. But this also, is not the best way to open a door 
(vii) In fig.d, the $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ is applied exactly at the outer edge. We see that, $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ is perpendicular to the surface of the door. 
• The door will rotate. And this is the best way to open a door
• $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ will be most effective in this case

So now we can make a comparison between translational motion and rotational motion. We can write:
• In translational motion, a force $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ is enough to change the state
• In rotational motion, 'how and where' the $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ is applied is also important if we want to change the state

■ We know that, in translational motion, the force $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ plays an important role
■ In rotational motion, that role is played by moment of force
■ 'Moment of force' is also referred to as torque or couple

• We will first see the role played by moment of force in the case of a single particle
• After that, we will extend it to a system of particles in a rigid body
• Let us consider a 2-D problem first. We will write it in steps:
1. In fig.7.83(a) below, a spanner is being used to loosen a nut
Fig.7.83
• A force $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ is applied on the spanner
2. $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ is applied at a point P on the spanner
• 'P' is shown as a yellow dot
• The vector $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ and the spanner lies on the same plane. So this is a 2-D problem
• We want to know the effect caused by $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ on the nut
3. Let us assume that, the center of the nut is the origin O of the frame of reference. This is shown in fig.b
• $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}}$ is the position vector of P
• $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ makes an angle θ with $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}}$ 
4. We want a perpendicular to $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$
• Also, that perpendicular should pass through O
• This is shown by the white dashed line
• Q is the foot of the perpendicular
5. Now we have a right triangle OPQ
• The length of OQ is obviously $\mathbf\small{|\vec{r}| \times \sin \theta}$
• This length OQ is very special:
It is the perpendicular distance of $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ from O  
6. The product of the applied force $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ and this perpendicular distance is called torque
• It is denoted by $\mathbf\small{\tau}$ (the Greek letter tau)
• So we can write:
$\mathbf\small{\tau=|\vec{F}|\times(|\vec{r}| \times \sin \theta)=|\vec{F}|\times|\vec{r}| \times \sin \theta}$
• Rearranging this, we get: $\mathbf\small{\tau=|\vec{r}| \times|\vec{F}|\times \sin \theta}$
7. But $\mathbf\small{|\vec{r}|\times|\vec{F}| \times \sin \theta=(\vec{r}\times \vec{F})}$
• That means $\mathbf\small{\tau}$ is the cross product of $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}}$ and $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$
• But cross product of two vectors is a vector
• That means, $\mathbf\small{\tau}$ is a vector. We must denote it as $\mathbf\small{\vec{\tau}}$
8. Thus we get: $\mathbf\small{\vec{\tau}=(\vec{r}\times \vec{F})}$
• So the magnitude of $\mathbf\small{\vec{\tau}}$ is given by: $\mathbf\small{|\vec{\tau}|=|\vec{r}|\times|\vec{F}| \times \sin \theta}$
• We can write:
$\mathbf\small{|\vec{\tau}|=|\vec{F}|\times(\text{Perpendicular distance of force from O})=|\vec{F}|\times |\vec{r}_\bot|}$
9. Now we want the direction
• We know that the cross product of two vectors will be perpendicular to the plane containing those two vectors
• So in our present case, $\mathbf\small{\vec{\tau}}$ is perpendicular to our computer screen
■ The question is:
Is it directed towards us?
OR, Is it directed away from us?
10. To find the answer, we apply the right hand screw rule
(i) Imagine that, a right handed screw is placed perpendicular to the computer screen
(ii) Assume that $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ is shifted upwards in such a way that, the tail ends of $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ and $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}}$  coincide   
(iii) Turn the screw in the direction from $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}}$ to $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$
• The screw will move towards us
(iii) So we can write: $\mathbf\small{\vec{\tau}}$ is perpendicular to the computer screen and is directed towards us  

• If $\mathbf\small{\vec{\tau}}$ has a high value, the nut will loosen out easily
• If $\mathbf\small{\vec{\tau}}$ has a low value, the nut may not rotate at all
• So we want a high $\mathbf\small{\vec{\tau}}$. Let us see how this can be achieved:
1. We have the magnitude of $\mathbf\small{\vec{\tau}}$:
$\mathbf\small{|\vec{\tau}|=|\vec{r}|\times|\vec{F}| \times \sin \theta}$
2. The 'sin θ' is causing the problem
• It is a fraction most of the time
Eg: sin 30 = 0.5, sin 45 = 0.7071, sin 60 = 0.8660, sin 75 = 0.9659 etc.
• Since it is a fraction, it will reduce the magnitude $\mathbf\small{(|\vec{r}|\times|\vec{F}|)}$
3. The only situation where such reduction does not occur, is when 'sin θ' = 1
• This occurs when θ = 90o
■ That is., when $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ is perpendicular to $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}}$
• In that case, we get: $\mathbf\small{|\vec{\tau}|=|\vec{r}|\times|\vec{F}| \times \sin 90}$
$\mathbf\small{\Rightarrow |\vec{\tau}|=|\vec{r}|\times|\vec{F}| \times 1}$
$\mathbf\small{\Rightarrow |\vec{\tau}|=|\vec{r}|\times|\vec{F}|}$
• This is shown in fig.7.83(c) above
4. Note that, the maximum value possible for sin θ is '1'
• That means, using sin θ, we cannot double or triple ($\mathbf\small{|\vec{r}|\times|\vec{F}|}$)
($\mathbf\small{|\vec{r}|\times|\vec{F}|}$) is the maximum possible value
5. Also note that, if we shift the point of application 'P' to the right, $\mathbf\small{|\vec{r}|}$ will increase. This will also cause an increase in $\mathbf\small{|\vec{\tau}|}$
• Further more, the magnitude $\mathbf\small{|\vec{F}|}$ can also be increased to obtain a higher $\mathbf\small{\vec{\tau}}$    
• Now we know why the method shown in fig.7.82(d) is the most effective for opening a door

Another aspect:
1. We have: $\mathbf\small{|\vec{\tau}|=|\vec{r}|\times|\vec{F}| \times \sin \theta}$
Rearranging this, we get: $\mathbf\small{|\vec{\tau}|=|\vec{r}|\times(|\vec{F}|\times \sin \theta)}$
2. Now consider fig.7.84(b) below:
Fig.7.84
• The $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ is inclined. But it will have a component perpendicular to $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}}$ 
• This perpendicular component is shown in green color in fig.b
3. From the right triangle PRS in fig.c, it is clear that, the magnitude of the perpendicular component is:
$\mathbf\small{(|\vec{F}|\times \sin \theta)}$
(Note that, ∠OPR and PRS are alternate angles and hence equal)
4. So the result in (1) can be written as:
$\mathbf\small{|\vec{\tau}|=(\text{Magnitude of the Perpendicular component of force})\times|\vec{r}|=|\vec{F}_\bot|\times |\vec{r}|}$

■ Thus, the magnitude $\mathbf\small{\vec{\tau}}$ can be calculated in two ways:
(i) $\mathbf\small{|\vec{\tau}|=|\vec{F}|\times |\vec{r}_\bot|}$
(ii) $\mathbf\small{|\vec{\tau}|=|\vec{F}_\bot|\times |\vec{r}|}$

Next we will look at a 3-D problem. We will write it in steps:
1. In fig.7.85(a) below, a particle 'P' is shown as a small red sphere. it is situated in space
Fig.7.85
• The position vector of 'P' is $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}}$. It is shown in brown color
• A force $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ acts on 'P'. It is shown in magenta color 
2. We see that there is a common point for $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}}$ and $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$
• Because, the head of $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}}$ coincides with tail of $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ 
3. So there must be a plane on which both $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}}$ and $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ lie
• This plane is shown in fig.7.85(b) above
• A bit of transparency is given to this plane. So we can see the y-axis through it, though in a blurred form
4. Next, we want the perpendicular distance of $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ from the origin O
• For that, we extend $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ backwards along the same line
• This is shown by the magenta dashed line in fig.7.86(a) below:
Fig.7.86
• We want a perpendicular to this magenta dashed line. Also it must pass through O
• Such a perpendicular is shown as the yellow dashed line in fig,7.86(b) above
• Q is the foot of the perpendicular
• Now we get a right triangle OPQ
5. Consider the plane in the above fig.7.86. It contains both $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}}$ and $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ 
• Imagine a line perpendicular to that plane. If we look at the plane along that perpendicular line, we will get a 2-D view. It is shown in fig.7.87 below:
Fig.7.87
• We see the triangle OPQ clearly
• We see that, θ is less than θ1
• So we must take θ as the angle between $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ and $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}}$   
• In the right triangle OPQ, we get: $\mathbf\small{OQ=|\vec{r}|\sin \theta}$
• This OQ is the perpendicular distance of $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ from O
6. The product of the applied force $\mathbf\small{|\vec{F}|}$ and this perpendicular distance is the 'torque exerted by $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ at O'
• So we can write:
$\mathbf\small{\tau=|\vec{F}|\times(|\vec{r}| \times \sin \theta)=|\vec{F}|\times|\vec{r}| \times \sin \theta}$
• Rearranging this, we get: $\mathbf\small{\tau=|\vec{r}| \times|\vec{F}|\times \sin \theta}$
• But $\mathbf\small{|\vec{r}|\times|\vec{F}| \times \sin \theta=(\vec{r}\times \vec{F})}$
• That means $\mathbf\small{\tau}$ is the cross product of $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}}$ and $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$
• But cross product of two vectors is a vector
• That means, $\mathbf\small{\tau}$ is a vector. We must denote it as $\mathbf\small{\vec{\tau}}$
• Thus we get:
Eq.7.17: $\mathbf\small{\vec{\tau}=(\vec{r}\times \vec{F})}$
■ So the magnitude of $\mathbf\small{\vec{\tau}}$ is given by: $\mathbf\small{|\vec{\tau}|=|\vec{r}|\times|\vec{F}| \times \sin \theta}$
• We can write:

$\mathbf\small{|\vec{\tau}|=|\vec{F}|\times(\text{Perpendicular distance of force from O})=|\vec{F}|\times |\vec{r}_\bot|}$
7. Now we want the direction
• We know that the cross product of two vectors will be perpendicular to the plane containing those two vectors
• We have already drawn that plane
• So in our present case, $\mathbf\small{\vec{\tau}}$ is perpendicular to that plane
■ The question is:
Is it directed upwards, away from that plane ?
OR, Is it directed downwards, into that plane ?
• To find the answer, we apply the right hand screw rule
(i) In fig.7.88(a) below, a right handed screw is placed perpendicular to the plane
Torque on a particle can be calculated as the cross product of position vector and force vector
Fig.7.88
(ii) Imagine that, $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ is shifted so that, it's tail end coincide with the tail end of $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}}$
(iii) Turn it in the direction from $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}}$ to $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ 
• The screw will move upwards, away from the plane
(iii) So we can write: $\mathbf\small{\vec{\tau}}$ is perpendicular to the plane and is directed upwards and away from the 'plane containing $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ and $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}}$'
• This $\mathbf\small{\vec{\tau}}$ is shown in cyan color in fig.7.88(b) above


The other aspect:
• Consider the plane containing both $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}}$ and $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ 
• Imagine a line perpendicular to that plane. If we look at the plane along that line we will get a 2-D view. We saw it earlier in fig.7.87. It is shown again in fig.7.89 below:
Fig.7.89
1. We have: $\mathbf\small{|\vec{\tau}|=|\vec{r}|\times|\vec{F}| \times \sin \theta}$
• Rearranging this, we get: $\mathbf\small{|\vec{\tau}|=|\vec{r}|\times(|\vec{F}|\times \sin \theta)}$
2. The $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ is inclined to $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}}$
• So it will have a component perpendicular to $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}}$ 
• This perpendicular component can be easily found out by completing the right triangle PRS
• The fact that SPR = OPQ (since they are opposite angles) helps us to complete the right triangle PRS
• Also note that, $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}}$ is extended along the same line
3. From the right triangle PRS, we get:
• The magnitude of the perpendicular component is = $\mathbf\small{(|\vec{F}|\times \sin \theta)}$
4. So the result in (1) can be written as:
$\mathbf\small{|\vec{\tau}|=(\text{Magnitude of the Normal component of force})\times|\vec{r}|=|\vec{F}_\bot|\times |\vec{r}|}$


So in the 3-D case also, we get the same two methods to find the magnitude $\mathbf\small{\vec{\tau}}$:
(i) $\mathbf\small{|\vec{\tau}|=|\vec{F}|\times |\vec{r}_\bot|}$
(ii) $\mathbf\small{|\vec{\tau}|=|\vec{F}_\bot|\times |\vec{r}|}$

Some interesting results:
1. We have: $\mathbf\small{|\vec{\tau}|=|\vec{F}|\times |\vec{r}_\bot|}$
• Consider fig.7.87 that we saw earlier
• In that fig., we know that $\mathbf\small{|\vec{r}_\bot|}$ = OQ 
• If the $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ pass through O,
OQ = $\mathbf\small{|\vec{r}_\bot|}$ = 0
• Then $\mathbf\small{|\vec{\tau}|=|\vec{F}|\times |\vec{r}_\bot|=0}$
• This is the reason why we cannot open a door by applying the force at the hinge  
2. We have: $\mathbf\small{|\vec{\tau}|=|\vec{F}_\bot|\times |\vec{r}|}$
• Consider fig.7.89 above
• In that fig., if θ = 0 or 180o, the $\mathbf\small{\vec{F}}$ will be aligned with $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}}$  
• There will be no force component perpendicular to $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}}$. That is:
SR = $\mathbf\small{|\vec{F}_\bot|}$ = 0
• Then $\mathbf\small{|\vec{\tau}|=|\vec{F}_\bot|\times |\vec{r}|=0}$ 
• So after reading (1) above, a person decides to apply a force at a point away from the hinge. But if that force is parallel to the surface of the door, it will not open
3. Finally, we all know that, if $\mathbf\small{|\vec{F}|}$ = 0, then $\mathbf\small{|\vec{\tau}|=0}$
This is like 'just touching the door' with out applying any force. The door certainly will not open

In the next section, we will see angular momentum

PREVIOUS           CONTENTS          NEXT

Copyright©2019 Higher Secondary Physics. blogspot.in - All Rights Reserved