Thursday, April 11, 2019

Chapter 7.6- Center of Mass in Three-Dimensional Problems

In the previous section, we saw the location of 'C' of some common objects. In this section we will see systems where particles are distributed in space

1. Consider a particle 'P' situated in space
• Let it be situated at a certain distance from the origin 'O' of the frame of reference
    ♦ x-axis is shown in red
    ♦ y-axis is shown in green
    ♦ z-axis is shown in blue
• This is shown in fig.7.42 (a) below:
Fig.7.42
2. The particle is shown as a yellow sphere
• It's mass is 0.5 kg
• We see that:
    ♦ It is not situated on the x-axis
    ♦ It is not situated on the y-axis
    ♦ It is not situated on the xy-plane
    ♦ It is situated in space
3. We know the method to specify the positions of such particles
• The method can be written in 5 steps:
(i) Drop a perpendicular from 'P' onto the xy-plane
• This is indicated by the blue line in fig.7.42(b) above
• Note that, the yellow sphere is a bit transparent. We see the blue line starting from the exact center of the sphere
(ii) Let P' be the foot of the perpendicular
• From P', draw a perpendicular onto the x-axis
• This is indicated by the green line
(iii) From P', draw a perpendicular onto the y-axis
• This is indicated by the red line
(iv) Let the length of the red line be xP = 2 m
• Let the length of the green line be yP = 3 m
• Let the length of the blue line be zP = 2 m
(v) Then the coordinates of P are (xP, yP, zP) = (2,3,2)
4. Consider another particle Q. It's mass is 0.75 kg. This is shown in fig.7.43(a) below:
Fig.7.43
• Q will have it's own red, green and blue lines
• Let the lengths of those lines be 1 m, 2 m, and 1 m respectively
• So the coordinates (xQ, yQ, zQ) will be (1,2,1)
5. So we have a system consisting of two particles P and Q
• We want the location of the 'C' of this system
6. In such cases, the 'C' lies at a point whose coordinates are (X,Y,Z)
• We already know the method to find 'X' and 'Y'
7. We can apply the same method to find 'Z' 
• But to find 'Z', the method should be applied in the z-direction
• As usual, the method involves only 4 steps:
(i) Take the distances (from the xy-plane) for each particle
(ii) Apply the 'due weightage' 
(iii) Find the average of those 'weighted distances'
(iv) This average is the 'Z'
8. So we can write a new equation:
Eq.7.3$\mathbf\small{Z=\frac{\sum{m_iz_i} }{\sum{m_i}}}$ 
9. Now we can form the table:
10. From the table, we get:
$\mathbf\small{\sum{m_i}=1.25}$
$\mathbf\small{\sum{m_ix_i}=1.75}$
$\mathbf\small{\sum{m_iy_i}=3}$
$\mathbf\small{\sum{m_iz_i}=1.75}$
• Thus we get: 
$\mathbf\small{X=\frac{\sum{m_ix_i} }{\sum{m_i}}=\frac{1.75}{1.25}=1.4\, \text{m}}$
$\mathbf\small{Y=\frac{\sum{m_iy_i} }{\sum{m_i}}=\frac{3}{1.25}=2.4\, \text{m}}$
$\mathbf\small{Z=\frac{\sum{m_iz_i} }{\sum{m_i}}=\frac{1.75}{1.25}=1.4\, \text{m}}$
11. Using these coordinates, we can mark 'C'. This is shown as a small white sphere in fig.7.43(b) above
• We see that, 'C' has it's own red, green and blue lines
    ♦ The length of it's red line = X = 1.4 m
    ♦ The length of it's green line = Y = 2.4 m
    ♦ The length of it's blue line = Z = 1.4 m
• Also note that, the 'C' lies on the line joining P and Q

• Now we know the method to find 'C' of the particles distributed in 3 dimensional space
• In such 3-dimensional problems, another easier method can be used. Let us see the details of that method:

1. In fig.7.44(a) below, a vector is shown in magenta color
The position vectors of the particles in a system can be effectively used to find the center of mass of that system
Fig.7.44
• It's tail end coincides with 'O'
• It's tip coincides with the center of 'P'
■ So it is the position vector of P
• We can denote it as $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_P}$. (Details here)
2. Imagine that, a person wants to go from O to P
• He can take either one of the two paths given below:
Path 1:
• This path is along the $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_P}$. It starts from O and ends at P
Path 2:
This path has 3 segments:
■ Segment 1:
• This segment starts from O
• The person travels a distance xP
    ♦ xP is the length of the red line
    ♦ So 'magnitude' of travel is xP  
• Direction of travel for this segment is: 'along the x-axis'
• So the magnitude and direction of this travel can be represented in vector form as: $\mathbf\small{(x_P)\hat{i}}$
• At the end of this travel, the person is at the foot of the green line
■ Segment 2:
• This segment starts from the foot of the green line
• The person travels a distance yP
    ♦ yP is the length of the green line
    ♦ So 'magnitude' of travel is yP  
• Direction of travel for this segment is: 'parallel to the y-axis'
• So the magnitude and direction of this travel can be represented in vector form as: $\mathbf\small{(y_P)\hat{j}}$
• At the end of this travel, the person is at the foot of the blue line
■ Segment 3:
• This segment starts from the foot of the blue line
• The person travels a distance zP
    ♦ zP is the length of the blue line
    ♦ So 'magnitude' of travel is zP  
• Direction of travel for this segment is: 'parallel to the z-axis'
• So the magnitude and direction of this travel can be represented in vector form as: $\mathbf\small{(z_P)\hat{k}}$
• At the end of this travel, the person reaches the particle P
3. So we see 3 vectors in path 2. If we add those vectors, we will reach P
• That means:
Path 2 = $\mathbf\small{(x_P)\hat{i}+(y_P)\hat{j}+(z_P)\hat{k}}$
4. The initial and final points in both paths 1 and 2 are the same
• So we can write: Path 1 = Path 2
• That is: $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_P=(x_P)\hat{i}+(y_P)\hat{j}+(z_P)\hat{k}}$
5. The above equality in (4) can be established based on fig.7.44(b) also:
(i) In fig.7.44(b), there are a total of 5 vectors:
Red, green, blue, yellow and magenta
(ii) We want to prove this:
Magenta = red + green + blue
(iii) Consider the following three vectors:
Red, green and yellow
• Applying triangle law of vector addition, we get:
yellow = red + green  
(iv) Consider the following three vectors:
Yellow, blue and magenta
• Applying triangle law of vector addition, we get:
Magenta = yellow + blue
(v) Now we expand 'yellow' using the result in (iii). We get:
Magenta = red + green + blue
• This is the required result that we mentioned in (ii)
6. So it is proved beyond doubt. We can confidently write:
$\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_P=(x_P)\hat{i}+(y_P)\hat{j}+(z_P)\hat{k}}$
• In this equation, 
    ♦ $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_P}$ is the position vector  
    ♦ xPyP and zP are the coordinates of P
■ So we can write:
The following two items are closely related:
(i) position vector of a particle
(ii) The coordinates of that particle

7. Now, if 'Q' is another particle with coordinates (xQ,yQ,zQ), we can write:
$\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_Q=(x_Q)\hat{i}+(y_Q)\hat{j}+(z_Q)\hat{k}}$
8. Consider the system consisting of the two particles P and Q
• Let 'C' be the center of mass of the system
• The coordinates of 'C' are (X,Y,Z)
9. If we know those coordinates, we can easily write the position vector of 'C'
• Based on (6) above, we get: $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_C=(X)\hat{i}+(Y)\hat{j}+(Z)\hat{k}}$
10. Now we expand X, Y and Z. We have:
• $\mathbf\small{X=\frac{m_p\,x_P+m_Q\,x_Q}{m_P+m_Q}=\frac{m_p\,x_P+m_Q\,x_Q}{M}}$
• $\mathbf\small{Y=\frac{m_p\,y_P+m_Q\,y_Q}{M}}$
• $\mathbf\small{Z=\frac{m_p\,z_P+m_Q\,z_Q}{M}}$
11. So the equation in (9) becomes:
$\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_C=\left[\frac{m_p\,x_P+m_Q\,x_Q}{M} \right]\hat{i}+\left[\frac{m_p\,y_P+m_Q\,y_Q}{M} \right]\hat{j}+\left[\frac{m_p\,z_P+m_Q\,z_Q}{M} \right]\hat{k}}$
$\mathbf\small{\Rightarrow \vec{r}_C=\frac{(m_P\,x_P)\hat{i}+(m_Q\,x_Q)\hat{i}+(m_P\,y_P)\hat{j}+(m_Q\,y_Q)\hat{j}+(m_P\,z_P)\hat{k}+(m_Q\,z_Q)\hat{k}}{M}}$
12. Now we rearrange the above equation by the two steps:
(i) Bringing the terms with mP together
(ii) Bringing the terms with mQ together
• We get:
$\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_C=\frac{[(m_P\,x_P)\hat{i}+(m_P\,y_P)\hat{j}+(m_P\,z_P)\hat{k}]+[(m_Q\,x_Q)\hat{i}+(m_Q\,y_Q)\hat{j}+(m_Q\,z_Q)\hat{k}]}{M}}$
• Taking mP and mQ outside, we get:
$\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_C=\frac{m_P[(x_P)\hat{i}+(y_P)\hat{j}+(z_P)\hat{k}]+m_Q[(x_Q)\hat{i}+(y_Q)\hat{j}+(z_Q)\hat{k}]}{M}}$
13. But:
    ♦ $\mathbf\small{(x_P)\hat{i}+(y_P)\hat{j}+(z_P)\hat{k}=\vec{r}_P}$ 
    ♦ $\mathbf\small{(x_Q)\hat{i}+(y_Q)\hat{j}+(z_Q)\hat{k}=\vec{r}_Q}$
• Thus (12) becomes:
$\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_C=\frac{m_P[\vec{r}_P]+m_Q[\vec{r}_Q]}{M}}$
14. This gives us an easy method to write the 'position vector of C'
• Let us check and see if we will get the same answer as before:
(i) The coordinates of P are (2,3,2)
• So $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_P=2\hat{i}+3\hat{j}+2\hat{k}}$
• So $\mathbf\small{m_P\,\vec{r}_P=0.5(2\hat{i}+3\hat{j}+2\hat{k})=\hat{i}+1.5\hat{j}+\hat{k}}$
(ii) The coordinates of Q are (1,2,1)
• So $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_Q=\hat{i}+2\hat{j}+\hat{k}}$
• So $\mathbf\small{m_Q\,\vec{r}_P=0.75(\hat{i}+2\hat{j}+\hat{k})=0.75\hat{i}+1.5\hat{j}+0.75\hat{k}}$
(iii) Thus the numerator in (13) becomes:
$\mathbf\small{(\hat{i}+1.5\hat{j}+\hat{k})+(0.75\hat{i}+1.5\hat{j}+0.75\hat{k})}$
$\mathbf\small{=(1.75\hat{i}+3.0\hat{j}+1.75\hat{k})}$
• The denominator M is the total mass = (mP + mQ) = (0.5+0.75) = 1.25 kg
(iv) Thus we get:
$\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_C=\frac{1.75\hat{i}+3.0\hat{j}+1.75\hat{k}}{1.25}=1.4\hat{i}+2.4\hat{j}+1.4\hat{k}}$
(v) So the coordinates of C are: (1.4,2.4,1.4)
• This is the same result that we obtained before

15. We will generalize this method:
• P, Q, R, S, . . . are various particles in a system
• There are a total of 'n' particles in the system
    ♦ P is the first particle
    ♦ Q is the second particle
    ♦ R is the third particle . . . so on . . .
• Then:
    ♦ mP is the first mass
    ♦ mQ is the second mass
    ♦ mR is the third mass . . . so on . . .
16. We can write:
    ♦ m1 which is equal to mP is the first mass
    ♦ m2 which is equal to mQ is the second mass
    ♦ m3 which is equal to mR is the third mass . . . so on . . .
• Then:
    ♦ mi is the ith mass
    ♦ mn is the last mass
17. Also we can write:
    ♦ $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_1}$ which is equal to $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_P}$ is the first position vector
    ♦ $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_2}$ which is equal to $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_Q}$ is the second position vector
    ♦ $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_3}$ which is equal to $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_R}$ is the third position vector . . . so on . . .
• Then:
    ♦ $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_i}$ is the ith position vector
    ♦ $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_n}$ is the last position vector
18. So the equation in (13) becomes:
$\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_C=\frac{m_1\,\vec{r}_1+m_2\,\vec{r}_2\,+\,.\,.\,.\,+\,m_i\,\vec{r}_i+\,.\,.\,.\,+\,m_n\,\vec{r}_n}{m_1+m_2\,+\,.\,.\,.\,+\,m_i+\,.\,.\,.\,+\,m_n}}$
$\mathbf\small{\Rightarrow \vec{r}_C=\frac{m_1\,\vec{r}_1+m_2\,\vec{r}_2\,+\,.\,.\,.\,+\,m_i\,\vec{r}_i+\,.\,.\,.\,+\,m_n\,\vec{r}_n}{M}}$
19. Thus we get 
Eq.7.4: $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_C=\frac{\sum{} \,m_i\,\vec{r}_i}{M}}$
• This equation is applicable to 2- dimensional and 1-dimensional problems as well

• Let us apply it to a two dimensional problem that we solved in the previous section
• We will consider solved example 7.3. We will do it as a new solved example:

Solved example 7.7
Three particles P, Q and R are situated at the vertices of an equilateral triangle of side 0.5 m. Their masses are 100 g, 150 g and 200 g respectively. Find the location of the 'C' of this system of 3 particles
Solution:
1. We have three particles so situated in space that, they are at the vertices of an equilateral triangle
• For ease in calculations, we arrange the frame of reference in the following way:
    ♦ The plane of the triangle lies in the xy-plane
    ♦ One of the sides (say PQ), lies on the x-axis
    ♦ The left vertex (P) of that side coincides with O
• This arrangement is shown in fig.7.35 below:
Fig.7.35
2. Once this arrangement is fixed, we can easily write the coordinates of the bottom vertices
• The coordinates of P will be (0,0)
• The coordinates of Q will be (0.5,0)
• The x-coordinate of R will be 0.25
3. To find the y-coordinate of R, we use the following steps:
• Drop a perpendicular from R. This is shown in fig.b
• The foot of this perpendicular is R'
• In the right triangle PR'R, we have:
$\mathbf\small{\sin 60=\frac{RR'}{PR}=\frac{RR'}{0.5}}$
$\mathbf\small{\Rightarrow RR'=\sin 60 \times 0.5=0.433}$
So the y-coordinate of R is 0.433
4. Once we obtain the coordinates, we can write the position vectors:
(i) $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_P=0\hat{i}+0\hat{j}}$
• This is a null vector
(ii) $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_Q=0.5\hat{i}+0\hat{j}}$
(iii) $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_R=0.25\hat{i}+0.433\hat{j}}$
5. We have: $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_C=\frac{\sum{} \,m_i\,\vec{r}_i}{M}}$
• The numerator becomes: $\mathbf\small{0.1 \times 0+0.15 \times 0.5\hat{i}+0.2 \times 0.25\hat{i}+0.2 \times 0.433\hat{j}}$
$\mathbf\small{0.125\hat{i}+0.0866\hat{j}}$ 
• The denominator is the total mass M = 0.450 kg
6. Thus we get: $\mathbf\small{\vec{r}_C=\frac{0.125\hat{i}+0.0866\hat{j}}{0.45}=0.278 \hat{i}+0.192 \hat{j}}$
7. So the coordinates of 'C' are: (0.278,0.192)
• This is the same result that we obtained earlier
• Note that, the unit vector $\mathbf\small{\hat{k}}$ does not come in the calculations because, this is a 2-dimensional problem

So now we know how to find the location of the 'C' of any given system. In the next section, we will see the significance of 'C'

PREVIOUS           CONTENTS          NEXT

Copyright©2019 Higher Secondary Physics. blogspot.in - All Rights Reserved

Tuesday, April 9, 2019

Chapter 7.5 - Center of mass of some common objects

In the previous section, we saw two-dimensional problems for finding 'C'In this section, we will find the location of 'C' of some common objects.

1. Consider a uniform square rod. Some images can be seen here.
• We are given a piece of such a rod. We want to find it's 'C'
• For that, we place it along the x-axis as shown in fig.7.36(a) below
• It is placed at a distance of 's' from O
Fig.7.36
• A 3D view is shown in fig.7.37 below:
Fig.7.37
2. Now, let us divide the rod into 5 equal pieces
Let the length of each piece be 'l'. This is shown in fig.7.36(b)
• Let x1 be the distance of the 'center of the first piece' from O
    ♦ Clearly, x1 = s + 0.5l
    ♦ This is shown in fig.7.36(b)
• Let x2 be the distance of the 'center of the second piece' from O
    ♦ Clearly, x2 = s + + 0.5= s + 1.5l
    ♦ This is shown in fig.7.36(b)
• The distances for the next 3 pieces can also be written in this way:
• Let x3 be the distance of the 'center of the third piece' from O
    ♦ Clearly, x3 = s + 2+ 0.5= s + 2.5l
• Let x4 be the distance of the 'center of the fourth piece' from O
    ♦ Clearly, x4 = s + 3+ 0.5= s + 3.5l
• Let x5 be the distance of the 'center of the fifth piece' from O
    ♦ Clearly, x5 = s + 4+ 0.5= s + 4.5l
3. We have: $\mathbf\small{X=\frac{\sum{m_ix_i} }{\sum{m_i}}}$
• We need to know the masses. Remember that, it is a 'uniform square rod'
• So where ever we make a cut, the cross section will be a square
• The size of that square will be the same at every section
• So, since the lengths of the pieces are the same, we can write:
• The masses are all equal. That is:
m1 m2 = m3 = m4 = m5 = m  
4. So the numerator in (3) will be:
m(s + 0.5l) + m(s + 1.5l) + m(s + 2.5l) + m(s + 3.5l) + m(s + 4.5l)
= ms + 0.5ml + ms + 1.5ml + ms + 2.5ml + ms + 3.5ml + ms + 4.5ml
= 5ms + 12.5 ml
• The denominator will be 5m
• So we get:
$\mathbf\small{X=\frac{5ms+12.5ml}{5m}=\frac{5ms+2.5\times 5ml}{5m}=(s+2.5l)}$  
• That means, the 'C' of the rod is situated at a distance of (s+2.5l) from O
5. Now, the total length of the rod is '5l'
• So '2.5l' indicates the geometric center of the rod
• Thus it is clear that, 'C' is at the geometric center of the rod. This is shown in fig.7.36(b)
6. If we arrange the axes in such a way that, 'O' coincides with the left end of the rod, calculations will become a little more easier
• This is because, in such an arrangement, 's' will be absent

■ For all uniform bodies, the 'C' will be at the geometric center
Some examples are:
1. Lamina
(i) A lamina is a plane object with a 'very small uniform thickness'
• In fig.7.38(a) below, a rectangular lamina is shown
Fig.7.38
(ii) Since it is rectangular, it's opposite sides are equal. 
• Also since it is a lamina, the thickness is uniform
(iii) The geometric center can be easily calculated in such cases
• The 'C' will be same as the geometric center. it is shown as a small white sphere
2. Cube
(i) Fig.b shows a cube. In the fig., the material of the cube is assumed to be transparent. So we can see the interior 
(ii) The geometric center of the cube can be determined using diagonals from opposite corners
(iii) If the 'distribution of particles in the cube' is uniform, the geometric center will be the 'C'
3. Cylinder
(i) Fig.c shows a cylinder. In the fig., the material of the cylinder is assumed to be transparent. So we can see the interior
(ii) The definition of the cylinder tells us that, the top and bottom must be 'circles of the same radius'. Then only we can call it a cylinder
(iii) The geometric center will be on the axis of the cylinder. Also it will be equi-distant from top and bottom
(iv) If the 'distribution of particles in the cylinder' is uniform, the geometric center will be the 'C'
4. Circular disc
(i) Fig.d shows a circular disc. It is thicker than a lamina. In the fig., the material of the disc cylinder is assumed to be transparent. So we can see the interior
(ii) A circular disc is same as a cylinder of small thickness
(iii) The geometric center will be on the axis of the disc. Also it will be equi-distant from top and bottom
(iv) If the 'distribution of particles in the disc' is uniform, the geometric center will be the 'C'
5. Circular ring
(i) Fig.e shows a circular ring
(ii) It is clear that, the geometric center will be on the axis. And also equi-distant from top and bottom
(iii) If the 'distribution of particles in the ring' is uniform, the geometric center will be the 'C'
• Note that, in this case, the material need not be transparent for us to see the interior

Note: The five bodies that we saw above have uniform shape. Now consider the body shown in fig.7.39 below:
Fig.7.39
• The cross section of this body will be different at different points along it's length
• We can cut it into pieces of the same length 'l'. But since the cross sections are different, the masses of those pieces will not be the same
• In such cases, the location of 'C' can be easily calculated using principles of calculus

We have seen the properties of lamina. We will now see some solved examples based on those properties

Solved example 7.4
Find the center of mass of a L-shaped lamina with dimensions as shown in fig.7.40(a) below. The mass of the lamina is 3 kg
Fig.7.40
Solution:
1. First we need to fix up a reference frame
• It will be most convenient if the x and y axes coincide with the edges of the lamina
• Such an arrangement is shown in fig.b
2. Based on this arrangement, the coordinates of the vertices (O, P, Q, R, S and T) can be easily written
• They are shown in fig.b
3. The measurements of the given lamina are in such a way that, it can be effectively divided into 3 equal squares. This is shown in fig.c
• Based on the coordinates written in fig.b, the coordinates of the center points (C1, C2 and C3) of the 3 squares can also be written. They are shown in fig.c
• Those coordinates will directly give us the distances of the squares from the two axes 
4. Next, we want the masses
• Given that, the total mass of the lamina is 3 kg
• Since the lamina is uniform, each of the 3 squares will be having same mass  
• Thus we get: Mass of each square = $\mathbf\small{Z=\frac{3\,(\text{kg})}{3}= 1\, \text{kg}}$
5. Now we can form the table:
• The first 3 columns can be filled up using the given data
• From the table, we get:
$\mathbf\small{\sum{m_i}=3}$
$\mathbf\small{\sum{m_ix_i}=2.5}$
$\mathbf\small{\sum{m_iy_i}=2.5}$
• Thus we get: 
$\mathbf\small{X=\frac{\sum{m_ix_i} }{\sum{m_i}}=\frac{2.5}{3}=0.83\, \text{m}}$
$\mathbf\small{Y=\frac{\sum{m_iy_i} }{\sum{m_i}}=\frac{2.5}{3}=0.83\, \text{m}}$

Solved example 7.5
Find the center of mass of a T-shaped lamina with dimensions as shown in fig.7.40(a) below
Fig.7.40
Solution:
1. First we need to fix up a reference frame
• It will be most convenient if the x and y axes coincide with the edges of the lamina
• Also the T-shaped lamina can be divided into simple rectangles 
• Such an arrangement is shown in fig.b
2. There are 3 rectangles and 1 void circle
• Let the centers of these components be C1C2C3and C4
• We can easily write the coordinates of those centers. We have:
C1(6.5,18), C2(6.5,12), C3(6.5,8.75), and C4(6.5,4)
3. Next we want the masses of those rectangles and the circle
• Given that, the lamina is uniform. So every 'one square meter area' of the lamina will be having the same mass
• Let the mass of 'one square meter area' of the lamina be 'k' kg
• Then we get:
    ♦ Mass of 1 = (Area of 1) × k = (13×4) × k = 52k
    ♦ Mass of 2 = (Area of 2) × k = (6×8× k = 48k
    ♦ Mass of 3 = (Area of 3) × k = (7.1× k = 7.1k
    ♦ Mass of 4 = (Area of 4) × k = (2×8× k = 16k
4. Now we can prepare the table:
• From the table, we get:
$\mathbf\small{\sum{m_i}=108.9k}$
$\mathbf\small{\sum{m_ix_i}=707.9k}$
$\mathbf\small{\sum{m_iy_i}=1513.9k}$
• Thus we get: 
$\mathbf\small{X=\frac{\sum{m_ix_i} }{\sum{m_i}}=\frac{707.9k}{108.9k}=6.5\, \text{m}}$
$\mathbf\small{Y=\frac{\sum{m_iy_i} }{\sum{m_i}}=\frac{1513.9k}{108.9k}=13.9\, \text{m}}$
This is shown in fig.c

Solved example 7.6
Find the center of mass of a triangular lamina
Solution:
1. Fig.7.41(a) below shows a triangular lamina PQR
Center of mass of a triangular lamina coincides with the centroid, which is the point of intersection of the medians
Fig.7.41

• Let us divide it into strips parallel to the base PQ

• We want the center of each of those strips
2. Three of those strips are shown in fig.b
• They are given three different colors: green, red and yellow
• Clearly, they are trapeziums. Because, top and bottom sides are parallel
• But they are not isosceles-trapeziums 
• Since they are not isosceles-trapeziums, it is not very easy to find the centers of those strips 
3. So we adopt another method:
• We decrease the heights of those trapeziums
• We decrease the heights to such a low level that, they almost become lines
• But they cannot become exact lines. Because, if they do, then height is zero and the area becomes zero
■ So we can write:
• The lamina is divided into strips of very small heights
• The heights tends to zero, but never becomes zero
4. In such a situation, those strips looks like lines
• And the 'midpoint of the strips' can be considered to be same as 'the midpoints of those lines'
5. Now we join the midpoints of those thin strips (lines). This is shown in fig.c
• The white line joins the midpoints
• This white line passes through two important points:
    ♦ The apex
    ♦ The midpoint of the base
• So the white line is a median
6. Let us write a summary of the steps written so far. It can be written in 4 steps:
(i) The lamina is divided into thin strips parallel to base PQ
(ii) The 'C' of any one of those strips is at the 'midpoint of the line representing that strip'
(iii) The 'C' of all the strips falls on a median
(iv) So the 'C' of the total lamina must be somewhere on that median 
7. But saying 'somewhere on the median' is not good enough. We want the exact point
• So we repeat the step by taking another vertex as the apex. This is shown in fig.d
• Q is chosen as the apex and PR is the base
• The median thus obtained is shown in black color
• The 'C' of the lamina must be somewhere on this black median
8. The two medians are shown together in fig.e
• The 'C' of the lamina must be on both the medians
• So it will be the point of intersection of the two medians
• But the point of intersection of the medians of a triangle is the centroid 'G' of that triangle
■ So we can write:
For a triangular lamina, 'C' coincides with 'G'

We completed a discussion on two cases:
(i) All the bodies lie on the x-axis
(ii) All the bodies are distributed in the xy-plane
In the next section, we will see the cases where the bodies are distributed in space

PREVIOUS           CONTENTS          NEXT

Copyright©2019 Higher Secondary Physics. blogspot.in - All Rights Reserved